Literature DB >> 18209969

[Measurement of the depth of anaesthesia].

G N Schmidt1, J Müller, P Bischoff.   

Abstract

One of the most important mandates of the anaesthesiologist is to control the depth of anaesthesia. An unsolved problem is that a straight definition of the depth of anaesthesia does not exist. Concerning this it is rational to separate hypnosis from analgesia, from muscle relaxation and from block of cardiovascular reactions. Clinical surrogate parameters such as blood pressure and heart rate are not well-suited for a valid statement about the depth of hypnosis. To answer this question the brain has become the focus of interest as the target of anaesthesia. It is possible to visualize the brain's electrical activity from anelectroencephalogram (EEG). The validity of the spontaneous EEG as an anesthetic depth monitor is limited by the multiphasic activity, especially when anaesthesia is induced (excitation) and in deep anaesthesia (burst suppression). Recently, various commercial monitoring systems have been introduced to solve this problem. These monitoring systems use different interpretations of the EEG or auditory-evoked potentials (AEP). These derived and calculated variables have no pure physiological basis. For that reason a profound knowledge of the algorithms and a validation of the monitoring systems is an indispensable prerequisite prior to their routine clinical use. For the currently available monitoring systems various studies have been reported. At this time it is important to know that the actual available monitors can only value the sedation and not the other components of anaesthesia. For example, they cannot predict if a patient will react to a painful stimulus or not. In the future it would be desirable to develop parameters which allow an estimate of the other components of anaesthesia in addition to the presently available monitoring systems to estimate sedation and muscle relaxation. These could be sensoric-evoked potentials to estimate analgesia and AEPs for the detection of awareness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18209969     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-007-1294-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  95 in total

1.  Changes in the rapidly extracted auditory evoked potentials index and the bispectral index during sedation induced by propofol or midazolam under epidural block.

Authors:  S J Ge; X L Zhuang; Y T Wang; Z D Wang; H T Li
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  ARX-derived auditory evoked potential index and bispectral index during the induction of anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil.

Authors:  Gunter N Schmidt; Petra Bischoff; Thomas Standl; Malte Issleib; Moritz Voigt; Jochen Schulte Am Esch
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Comparative evaluation of the Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Entropy Module and the Bispectral Index monitor during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.

Authors:  Gunter N Schmidt; Petra Bischoff; Thomas Standl; Angelika Hellstern; Olaf Teuber; Jochen Schulte Esch
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  The evidence that deep anesthesia impacts long term mortality is not compelling.

Authors:  Jeremy Scarlett; Nathan Hahn; Eric Jacobsohn; Michael S Avidan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Comparison of electrophysiologic monitors with clinical assessment of level of sedation.

Authors:  Christopher J Chisholm; Joseph Zurica; Dmitry Mironov; Robert R Sciacca; Eugene Ornstein; Eric J Heyer
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Recovery from paralysis with succinylcholine increased Response entropy and EMG but not State entropy.

Authors:  Verna L Baughman; William E Hoffman; Heidi M Koenig; Peggy L Wheeler; Ranga C Ananda; Mathew Wang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Comparability of Narcotrend index and bispectral index during propofol anaesthesia.

Authors:  S Kreuer; J Bruhn; R Larsen; P Bialas; W Wilhelm
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-06-11       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  [Anesthesia with flunitrazepam/fentanyl and isoflurane/fentanyl. Unconscious perception and mid-latency auditory evoked potentials].

Authors:  D Schwender; A Kaiser; S Klasing; E Faber-Züllig; W Golling; E Pöppel; K Peter
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  [SNAP-index and bispectral index during induction of anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil].

Authors:  G N Schmidt; T Standl; G Lankenau; A Hellstern; C Hipp; P Bischoff
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.698

10.  Alaris AEP monitor's "Click Detection" does not help to detect inadvertent disconnection of headphones during anesthesia.

Authors:  Gunter N Schmidt; Petra Bischoff; Thomas Standl; Andreas Gerhardt; Gunnar Lankenau; Jochen Schulte em Esch
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  8 in total

1.  [Good to know: young scientists' research topics].

Authors:  V S Eckle; S N Stehr
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Awareness under general anesthesia.

Authors:  Petra Bischoff; Ingrid Rundshagen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Changes of cortical connectivity during deep anaesthesia.

Authors:  Bogdan Pavel; Camelia Alexandra Acatrinei; Fabien Menardy; Carmen Mihaela Denise Zahiu; Daniela Popa; Ana-Maria Zagrean; Leon Zagrean
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2015-10

4.  Recovery index, attentiveness and state of memory after xenon or isoflurane anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ralph Stuttmann; Jens Jakubetz; Kati Schultz; Claudia Schäfer; Sebastian Langer; Utz Ullmann; Peter Hilbert
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 5.  [Undesired awareness phenomena during general anesthesia: Evidence-based state of knowledge, current discussions and strategies for prevention and management].

Authors:  P Bischoff; I Rundshagen; G Schneider
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Monitoring the depth of anaesthesia.

Authors:  Bojan Musizza; Samo Ribaric
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Computer-based diagnostic expert systems in rheumatology: where do we stand in 2014?

Authors:  Hannes Alder; Beat A Michel; Christian Marx; Giorgio Tamborrini; Thomas Langenegger; Pius Bruehlmann; Johann Steurer; Lukas M Wildi
Journal:  Int J Rheumatol       Date:  2014-07-08

8.  Effects of isoflurane, remifentanil and dexmedetomidine on selected EEG parameters derived from a Narcotrend Monitor before and after nociceptive stimulation at different MAC multiples in cats.

Authors:  Jonathan F Raue; Julia Tünsmeyer; Sabine B R Kästner
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.741

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.