Literature DB >> 21738291

Evaluation of the SEDline to improve the safety and efficiency of conscious sedation.

Thomas D Caputo1, Michael A E Ramsay, Jeffrey A Rossmann, M Miles Beach, Garth R Griffiths, Benjamin Meyrat, James B Barnes, David G Kerns, Brad Crump, Barnett Bookatz, Paul Ezzo.   

Abstract

Brain function monitors have improved safety and efficiency in general anesthesia; however, they have not been adequately tested for guiding conscious sedation for periodontal surgical procedures. This study evaluated the patient state index (PSI) obtained from the SEDline monitor (Sedline Inc., San Diego, CA) to determine its capacity to improve the safety and efficiency of intravenous conscious sedation during outpatient periodontal surgery. Twenty-one patients at the periodontics clinic of Baylor College of Dentistry were admitted to the study in 2009 and sedated to a moderate level using midazolam and fentanyl during periodontal surgery. The PSI monitoring was blinded from the clinician, and the following data were collected: vital signs, Ramsay sedation scale (RSS), medications administered, adverse events, PSI, electroencephalography, and the patients' perspective through visual analogue scales. The data were correlated to evaluate the PSI's ability to assess the level of sedation. Results showed that the RSS and PSI did not correlate (r = -0.25) unless high values associated with electromyographical (EMG) activity were corrected (r = -0.47). Oxygen desaturation did not correlate with the PSI (r = -0.08). Satisfaction (r = -0.57) and amnesia (r = -0.55) both increased as the average PSI decreased. In conclusion, within the limits of this study, PSI appears to correlate with amnesia, allowing a practitioner to titrate medications to that effect. It did not provide advance warning of adverse events and had inherent inaccuracies due to EMG activity during oral surgery. The PSI has the potential to increase safety and efficiency in conscious sedation but requires further development to eliminate EMG activity from confounding the score.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21738291      PMCID: PMC3124903          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2011.11928715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of electrophysiologic monitors with clinical assessment of level of sedation.

Authors:  Christopher J Chisholm; Joseph Zurica; Dmitry Mironov; Robert R Sciacca; Eugene Ornstein; Eric J Heyer
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Depth of anesthesia monitoring.

Authors:  T Andrew Bowdle
Journal:  Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2006-12

Review 3.  Assessing pain by facial expression: facial expression as nexus.

Authors:  Kenneth M Prkachin
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.037

4.  Reformulation of the sedation continuum.

Authors:  Steven M Green; Keira P Mason
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  A comparison of patient state index and bispectral index values during the perioperative period.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Chen; Jun Tang; Paul F White; Ronald H Wender; Hong Ma; Alexander Sloninsky; Robert Kariger
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Bispectral index monitoring allows faster emergence and improved recovery from propofol, alfentanil, and nitrous oxide anesthesia. BIS Utility Study Group.

Authors:  T J Gan; P S Glass; A Windsor; F Payne; C Rosow; P Sebel; P Manberg
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Supplemental oxygen impairs detection of hypoventilation by pulse oximetry.

Authors:  Eugene S Fu; John B Downs; John W Schweiger; Rafael V Miguel; Robert A Smith
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Use of bispectral index system (BIS) to Monitor Enteral Conscious (moderate) sedation during general dental procedures.

Authors:  Mark Donaldson; Jason H Goodchild
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Patient State Index: titration of delivery and recovery from propofol, alfentanil, and nitrous oxide anesthesia.

Authors:  David R Drover; Harry J Lemmens; Eric T Pierce; Gilles Plourde; Gary Loyd; Eugene Ornstein; Leslie S Prichep; Robert J Chabot; Laverne Gugino
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  An objective evaluation of clinical signs used to assess sedation with intravenous diazepam.

Authors:  D Donaldson; T J Harrop; R E Klienknecht
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1980 Jan-Feb
View more
  3 in total

1.  The Patient State Index is well balanced for propofol sedation.

Authors:  K H Lee; Y H Kim; Y J Sung; M K Oh
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Unusual elevation in Entropy but not in PSI during general anesthesia: a case report.

Authors:  Young Sung Kim; Dongik Chung; Seok Kyeong Oh; Young Ju Won; Il Ok Lee
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Advanced Monitoring Is Associated with Fewer Alarm Events During Planned Moderate Procedure-Related Sedation: A 2-Part Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Richard L Applegate; John Lenart; Mathew Malkin; Minhthy N Meineke; Silvana Qoshlli; Monica Neumann; J Paul Jacobson; Alison Kruger; Jeffrey Ching; Mohammad Hassanian; Michael Um
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.108

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.