Literature DB >> 20150340

On the utility of short intron sequences as a reference for the detection of positive and negative selection in Drosophila.

John Parsch1, Sergey Novozhilov, Sarah S Saminadin-Peter, Karen M Wong, Peter Andolfatto.   

Abstract

The detection of selection, both positive and negative, acting on a DNA sequence or class of nucleotide sites requires comparison with a reference sequence that is unaffected by selection. In Drosophila, recent findings of widespread selective constraint, as well as adaptive evolution, in both coding and noncoding regions highlight the difficulties in choosing such a reference sequence. Here, we investigate the utility of short intron sequences as a reference for the detection of selection. For a set of 119 Drosophila melanogaster genes containing 195 short introns (<or=120 bp), we analyzed polymorphism and divergence at 1) 4-fold synonymous sites, 2) all sites of introns <or=120 bp, 3) all sites of introns <or=65 bp, 4) bases 8-30 of introns <or=120 bp, and 5) bases 8-30 of introns <or=65 bp. The last class of sites shows the highest levels of both interspecific divergence and intraspecific polymorphism, suggesting that these sites are under the least selective constraint. Bases 8-30 of introns <or=65 bp also have the lowest ratio of divergence to polymorphism, which may indicate that a small proportion of substitutions in the other classes of sites are the result of adaptive evolution. Although there is little signal of selection on the primary sequence of short introns, patterns of insertion-deletion polymorphism and divergence suggest that both positive and negative selection act to maintain an optimal intron length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20150340      PMCID: PMC2877998          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  65 in total

1.  Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites.

Authors:  Z Yang; R Nielsen; N Goldman; A M Pedersen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Positive and negative selection on the human genome.

Authors:  J C Fay; G J Wyckoff; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Analysis of conserved noncoding DNA in Drosophila reveals similar constraints in intergenic and intronic sequences.

Authors:  C M Bergman; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  The McDonald-Kreitman test and slightly deleterious mutations.

Authors:  Jane Charlesworth; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Effects of X-linkage and sex-biased gene expression on the rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  John F Baines; Stanley A Sawyer; Daniel L Hartl; John Parsch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Selective constraint in intergenic regions of human and mouse genomes.

Authors:  S A Shabalina; A Y Ogurtsov; V A Kondrashov; A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  The correlation between intron length and recombination in drosophila. Dynamic equilibrium between mutational and selective forces.

Authors:  J M Comeron; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Positive and negative selection on noncoding DNA in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Penelope R Haddrill; Doris Bachtrog; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  The influence of demography and weak selection on the McDonald-Kreitman test: an empirical study in Drosophila.

Authors:  John Parsch; Zhi Zhang; John F Baines
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Conflicting selection pressures on synonymous codon use in yeast suggest selection on mRNA secondary structures.

Authors:  Nina Stoletzki
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  49 in total

1.  A genome-wide scan for genes under balancing selection in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Myriam Croze; Andreas Wollstein; Vedran Božičević; Daniel Živković; Wolfgang Stephan; Stephan Hutter
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.260

2.  Genetic and evolutionary correlates of fine-scale recombination rate variation in Drosophila persimilis.

Authors:  Laurie S Stevison; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Determining the factors driving selective effects of new nonsynonymous mutations.

Authors:  Christian D Huber; Bernard Y Kim; Clare D Marsden; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Methods to detect selection on noncoding DNA.

Authors:  Ying Zhen; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

Review 5.  Constraints and plasticity in genome and molecular-phenome evolution.

Authors:  Eugene V Koonin; Yuri I Wolf
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Genome-wide maps of ribosomal occupancy provide insights into adaptive evolution and regulatory roles of uORFs during Drosophila development.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Shengqian Dou; Feng He; Junjie Luo; Liping Wei; Jian Lu
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Both size and GC-content of minimal introns are selected in human populations.

Authors:  Dapeng Wang; Jun Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Elevated Linkage Disequilibrium and Signatures of Soft Sweeps Are Common in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Nandita R Garud; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Inferences of demography and selection in an African population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Jeffrey D Jensen; Andrew G Clark; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Allelic polymorphism at foxo contributes to local adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Nicolas J Betancourt; Subhash Rajpurohit; Esra Durmaz; Daniel K Fabian; Martin Kapun; Thomas Flatt; Paul Schmidt
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.