Literature DB >> 12447299

EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas: evaluation of pancreatitis as a complication.

Frank Gress1, Hazar Michael, Daniel Gelrud, Panjak Patel, Klaus Gottlieb, Frank Singh, James Grendell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration is rapidly becoming the procedure of choice for the diagnostic evaluation of pancreatic masses. Acute pancreatitis has been reported after EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas. This study evaluated the effect of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration on the pancreas by serial measurement of amylase and lipase levels and determining the frequency of acute pancreatitis after EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic masses.
METHODS: In 100 consecutive patients referred for EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of a pancreatic mass, amylase and lipase levels were determined immediately before and within 2 hours after the procedure. Additionally, patients were questioned as to the occurrence of symptoms of acute pancreatitis within 48 hours after EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration.
RESULTS: For 2 of 100 patients (2%) there was clinical and biochemical evidence of acute pancreatitis after EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Both patients had a history of recent pancreatitis. In addition, there was a significant increase in postprocedure lipase levels (p = 0.40) compared with amylase levels in this patient subset.
CONCLUSION: The frequency of acute pancreatitis after EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas was 2% in this study. A history of recent pancreatitis appears to be a potential risk factor. Amylase and lipase levels can be elevated after EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and in most cases have no clinical significance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12447299     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.129602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  18 in total

Review 1.  Minimizing complications in pancreaticobiliary endoscopy.

Authors:  Olga Barkay; Mouen Khashab; Mohammad Al-Haddad; Evan L Fogel
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-04

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreatic neoplasms-solid and cystic: A review.

Authors:  Eric M Nelsen; Darya Buehler; Anurag V Soni; Deepak V Gopal
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-04-16

3.  Quality indicators for EUS.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Michael B Wallace; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; Michael L Kochman; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Jeffrey L Tokar
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  Resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: what does it matter?

Authors:  Daniel M Halperin; Gauri R Varadhachary
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  EUS-guided fine-needle injection of gemcitabine for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Levy; Steven R Alberts; William R Bamlet; Patrick A Burch; Michael B Farnell; Ferga C Gleeson; Michael G Haddock; Michael L Kendrick; Ann L Oberg; Gloria M Petersen; Naoki Takahashi; Suresh T Chari
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Severe acute pancreatitis after EUS-FNA of a pancreatic cyst: a rare, but serious complication.

Authors:  Els F Jonkman; Bas A C van Tuyl; Floris B M Sanders; Lenneke E M Haas
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-05-12

7.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses with rapid on-site cytological evaluation by endosonographers without attendance of cytopathologists.

Authors:  Takuto Hikichi; Atsushi Irisawa; Manoop S Bhutani; Tadayuki Takagi; Goro Shibukawa; Go Yamamoto; Takeru Wakatsuki; Hidemichi Imamura; Yuta Takahashi; Ai Sato; Masaki Sato; Tsunehiko Ikeda; Yuko Hashimoto; Kazuhiro Tasaki; Kazuo Watanabe; Hiromasa Ohira; Katsutoshi Obara
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 8.  Diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography: assessment of safety and prevention of complications.

Authors:  Christian Jenssen; Maria Victoria Alvarez-Sánchez; Bertrand Napoléon; Siegbert Faiss
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Endoscopic ultrasonography for surveillance of individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Gabriele Lami; Maria Rosa Biagini; Andrea Galli
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-07-16

10.  Utility of pancreatic duct brushing for diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Naohito Uchida; Hideki Kamada; Kunihiko Tsutsui; Masahiro Ono; Yuichi Aritomo; Tsutomu Masaki; Yoshio Kushida; Reiji Haba; Toshiaki Nakatsu; Shigeki Kuriyama
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.