Michael J Levy1, Steven R Alberts2, William R Bamlet3, Patrick A Burch2, Michael B Farnell4, Ferga C Gleeson1, Michael G Haddock5, Michael L Kendrick4, Ann L Oberg3, Gloria M Petersen6, Naoki Takahashi7, Suresh T Chari1. 1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 2. Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 3. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 6. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 7. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Among the greatest hurdles to pancreatic cancer (PC) therapy is the limited tissue penetration of systemic chemotherapy because of tumor desmoplasia. The primary study aim was to determine the toxicity profile of EUS-guided fine-needle injection (EUS-FNI) with gemcitabine. Secondary endpoints included the ability to disease downstage leading to an R0 resection and overall survival (OS) at 6 months, 12 months, and 5 years after therapy. METHODS: In a prospective study from a tertiary referral center, gemcitabine (38 mg/mL) EUS-FNI was performed in patients with PC before conventional therapy. Initial and delayed adverse events (AEs) were assessed within 72 hours and 4 to 14 days after EUS-FNI, respectively. Patients were followed for ≥5 years or until death. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with stage II (n = 3), stage III (n = 20), or stage IV (n = 13) disease underwent gemcitabine EUS-FNI with 2.5 mL (.7-7.0 mg) total volume of injectate per patient. There were no initial or delayed AEs reported. Thirty-five patients (97.2%) were deceased at the time of analysis with a median 10.3 months of follow-up (range, 3.1-63.9). OS at 6 months and 12 months was 78% and 44%, respectively. The median OS was 10.4 months (range, 2.7-68). Among patients with stage III unresectable disease, 4 (20%) were downstaged and underwent an R0 resection. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests the feasibility, safety, and potential efficacy of gemcitabine EUS-FNI for PC. Additional data are needed to verify these observations and to determine the potential role relative to conventional multimodality therapy.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Among the greatest hurdles to pancreatic cancer (PC) therapy is the limited tissue penetration of systemic chemotherapy because of tumor desmoplasia. The primary study aim was to determine the toxicity profile of EUS-guided fine-needle injection (EUS-FNI) with gemcitabine. Secondary endpoints included the ability to disease downstage leading to an R0 resection and overall survival (OS) at 6 months, 12 months, and 5 years after therapy. METHODS: In a prospective study from a tertiary referral center, gemcitabine (38 mg/mL) EUS-FNI was performed in patients with PC before conventional therapy. Initial and delayed adverse events (AEs) were assessed within 72 hours and 4 to 14 days after EUS-FNI, respectively. Patients were followed for ≥5 years or until death. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with stage II (n = 3), stage III (n = 20), or stage IV (n = 13) disease underwent gemcitabineEUS-FNI with 2.5 mL (.7-7.0 mg) total volume of injectate per patient. There were no initial or delayed AEs reported. Thirty-five patients (97.2%) were deceased at the time of analysis with a median 10.3 months of follow-up (range, 3.1-63.9). OS at 6 months and 12 months was 78% and 44%, respectively. The median OS was 10.4 months (range, 2.7-68). Among patients with stage III unresectable disease, 4 (20%) were downstaged and underwent an R0 resection. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests the feasibility, safety, and potential efficacy of gemcitabineEUS-FNI for PC. Additional data are needed to verify these observations and to determine the potential role relative to conventional multimodality therapy.
Authors: Jason E Faris; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Shaunagh McDermott; Alexander R Guimaraes; Jackie Szymonifka; Mai Anh Huynh; Cristina R Ferrone; Jennifer A Wargo; Jill N Allen; Lauren E Dias; Eunice L Kwak; Keith D Lillemoe; Sarah P Thayer; Janet E Murphy; Andrew X Zhu; Dushyant V Sahani; Jennifer Y Wo; Jeffrey W Clark; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo; David P Ryan; Theodore S Hong Journal: Oncologist Date: 2013-05-08
Authors: Philip A Philip; Jacqueline Benedetti; Christopher L Corless; Ralph Wong; Eileen M O'Reilly; Patrick J Flynn; Kendrith M Rowland; James N Atkins; Barry C Mirtsching; Saul E Rivkin; Alok A Khorana; Bryan Goldman; Cecilia M Fenoglio-Preiser; James L Abbruzzese; Charles D Blanke Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C J van Moorsel; A M Bergman; G Veerman; D A Voorn; V W Ruiz van Haperen; J R Kroep; H M Pinedo; G J Peters Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2000-03-06
Authors: R Alvarez; M Musteanu; E Garcia-Garcia; P P Lopez-Casas; D Megias; C Guerra; M Muñoz; Y Quijano; A Cubillo; J Rodriguez-Pascual; C Plaza; E de Vicente; S Prados; S Tabernero; M Barbacid; F Lopez-Rios; M Hidalgo Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Jennifer Caceres; Maria Munoz-Sagastibelza; A K M Nawshad Hossian; Jenny Paredes; Kaylene Barrera; George Mattheolabakis; Laura A Martello; Shivakumar Vignesh Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2019-08-08
Authors: Kyle C Kloepping; Alora S Kraus; Devin K Hedlund; Colette M Gnade; Brett A Wagner; Michael L McCormick; Melissa A Fath; Dongrim Seol; Tae-Hong Lim; Garry R Buettner; Prabhat C Goswami; F Christopher Pigge; Douglas R Spitz; Michael K Schultz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andre Bratanic; Dorotea Bozic; Antonio Mestrovic; Dinko Martinovic; Marko Kumric; Tina Ticinovic Kurir; Josko Bozic Journal: World J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2021-12-15