Literature DB >> 23002335

Diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography: assessment of safety and prevention of complications.

Christian Jenssen1, Maria Victoria Alvarez-Sánchez, Bertrand Napoléon, Siegbert Faiss.   

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has gained wide acceptance as an important, minimally invasive diagnostic tool in gastroenterology, pulmonology, visceral surgery and oncology. This review focuses on data regarding risks and complications of non-interventional diagnostic EUS and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB). Measures to improve the safety of EUS und EUS-FNB will be discussed. Due to the specific mechanical properties of echoendoscopes in EUS, there is a low but noteworthy risk of perforation. To minimize this risk, endoscopists should be familiar with the specific features of their equipment and their patients' specific anatomical situations (e.g., tumor stenosis, diverticula). Most diagnostic EUS complications occur during EUS-FNB. Pain, acute pancreatitis, infection and bleeding are the primary adverse effects, occurring in 1% to 2% of patients. Only a few cases of needle tract seeding and peritoneal dissemination have been reported. The mortality associated with EUS and EUS-FNB is 0.02%. The risks associated with EUS-FNB are affected by endoscopist experience and target lesion. EUS-FNB of cystic lesions is associated with an increased risk of infection and hemorrhage. Peri-interventional antibiotics are recommended to prevent cyst infection. Adequate education and training, as well consideration of contraindications, are essential to minimize the risks of EUS and EUS-FNB. Restricting EUS-FNB only to patients in whom the cytopathological results may be expected to change the course of management is the best way of reducing the number of complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute pancreatitis; Bleeding; Complications; Contraindications; Endoscopic ultrasonography; Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy; Infection; Perforation; Risk; Safety

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23002335      PMCID: PMC3442204          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i34.4659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  193 in total

1.  Diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma by EUS-FNA of a portal vein thrombus.

Authors:  Rebecca Lai; Valerie Stephens; Ricardo Bardales
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Intramural bronchogenic cysts mimicking solid tumors.

Authors:  M Westerterp; J G van den Berg; J J B van Lanschot; P Fockens
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  A first report of tumor seeding because of EUS-guided FNA of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sarto C Paquin; Gilles Gariépy; Luigi Lepanto; Raymond Bourdages; Ginette Raymond; Anand V Sahai
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Complication after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of rectal lesion.

Authors:  G Mezzi; P G Arcidiacono; S Carrara; M Freschi; C Boemo; P A Testoni
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Use of antimicrobials for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cysts: a retrospective, comparative analysis.

Authors:  Carlos Guarner-Argente; Pari Shah; Anna Buchner; Nuzhat A Ahmad; Michael L Kochman; Gregory G Ginsberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Comparison of propofol deep sedation versus moderate sedation during endosonography.

Authors:  D S Nayar; W G Guthrie; A Goodman; Y Lee; M Feuerman; L Scheinberg; F G Gress
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  EUS-guided FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors before surgery.

Authors:  José Celso Ardengh; Gustavo Andrade de Paulo; Angelo Paulo Ferrari
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Comparison of differing sedation practice for upper endoscopic ultrasound using expert observational analysis of the procedural sedation.

Authors:  John Michael Trummel; Stephen D Surgenor; Joseph P Cravero; Stuart R Gordon; George T Blike
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Efficacy, safety, and predictive factors for a positive yield of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy: a large tertiary referral center experience.

Authors:  Titus Thomas; Phillip V Kaye; Krish Ragunath; Guruprasad Aithal
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Transaortic EUS-guided FNA in the diagnosis of lung tumors and lymph nodes.

Authors:  Martin B von Bartheld; Klaus F Rabe; Jouke T Annema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part I: endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and transcutaneous mediastinal ultrasound (TMUS), introduction into ultrasound techniques.

Authors:  Christoph Frank Dietrich; Jouke Tabe Annema; Paul Clementsen; Xin Wu Cui; Mathias Maximilian Borst; Christian Jenssen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Learning models for endoscopic ultrasonography in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Gwang Ha Kim; Sung Jo Bang; Joo Ha Hwang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography for preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas.

Authors:  Reyhan Ersoy; Osman Ersoy; Berna Evranos Ogmen; Sefika Burcak Polat; Mehmet Kilic; Nilufer Yildirim; Levent Ozturk; Bekir Cakir
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  Training in ERCP and EUS in the UK anno 2017.

Authors:  Noor Lh Bekkali; Gavin J Johnson
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-10

Review 5.  Endoscopic ultrasound of pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Charing C N Chong; Raymond S Y Tang; John C T Wong; Anthony W H Chan; Anthony Y B Teoh
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-07-22

6.  Comparative analysis of ERCP, IDUS, EUS and CT in predicting malignant bile duct strictures.

Authors:  Hauke S Heinzow; Sara Kammerer; Carina Rammes; Johannes Wessling; Dirk Domagk; Tobias Meister
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  The new era of endoscopic ultrasound in biliary disorders.

Authors:  Cosmas Rinaldi Adithya Lesmana; Baiq Kirana Dyah Mandasari
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-24

8.  Routine staging with endoscopic ultrasound in patients with obstructing esophageal cancer and dysphagia rarely impacts treatment decisions.

Authors:  Sara A Mansfield; Samer El-Dika; Somashekar G Krishna; Kyle A Perry; Jon P Walker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in pregnancy: A high-volume study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Buğra Tolga Konduk; Onur Bayraktar
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 10.  Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography: an overview of safety and complications.

Authors:  María Victoria Alvarez-Sánchez; Christian Jenssen; Siegbert Faiss; Bertrand Napoléon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.