Literature DB >> 12447005

Assessment of gadobenate dimeglumine for magnetic resonance angiography: phase I studies.

M V Knopp1, S O Schoenberg, C Rehm, F Floemer, H von Tengg-Kobligk, M Bock, H R Hentrich.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To assess the vascular contrasting properties of a new MR contrast agent (gadobenate dimeglumine [Gd-BOPTA]), which presents higher relaxivity because of reversible, weak protein interaction, and, to compare these properties with a standard gadolinium agent.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two phase I trials compared intraindividually: (A) the vascular contrasting properties of Gd-BOPTA at three doses (0.0125, 0.05, and 0.2 mmol/kg body weight) and two flow rates (0.5 and 2.0 mL/s) in 10 volunteers; and (B) 0.1 mmol/kg body weight doses of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DTPA at 2.0 mL/s using a modified magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) sequence with a temporal resolution of 1 s/f. Quantitative (ROI analysis) and fully blinded qualitative (reader review) assessment of images was performed.
RESULTS: A dose of 0.2 mmol/kg resulted in higher maximum intensities, longer median peak widths, and larger areas under the curve than did the lower doses (0.0125 mmol/kg and 0.05 mmol/kg). In the intraindividual comparison, Gd-BOPTA demonstrated significantly better vascular enhancement characteristics in terms of signal peak duration (p < 0.05), maximum signal intensity (p < 0.05), and area under the enhancement curve (p < 0.01). The multireader assessment for overall vascular contrast preferred Gd-BOPTA at p < 0.03.
CONCLUSIONS: Gd-BOPTA was shown to exhibit preferential and different vascular enhancement properties as compared with Gd-DTPA for MRA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12447005     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200212000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  12 in total

Review 1.  Clinical experience with MultiHance in CNS imaging.

Authors:  M Essig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  [Significance of MR angiography for imaging diagnostics of carotid artery diseases].

Authors:  L Schuster; T Hauser; M Essig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Preliminary experience with MRA in evaluating the degree of carotid stenosis and plaque morphology using high-resolution sequences after gadofosveset trisodium (Vasovist) administration: comparison with CTA and DSA.

Authors:  M Anzidei; A Napoli; D Geiger; B Cavallo Marincola; C Zini; F Zaccagna; P Di Paolo; C Catalano; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  High-relaxivity contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neuroimaging: a review.

Authors:  Frederik L Giesel; Amit Mehndiratta; Marco Essig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadodiamide in the evaluation of spinal vascular anatomy with MR angiography.

Authors:  M V Spampinato; S A Nguyen; Z Rumboldt
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance angiography of the renal arteries: interindividual comparison of 0.2 mmol/kg gadobutrol at 1.5 T and 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Ulrike I Attenberger; Henrik J Michaely; Bernd J Wintersperger; Steven P Sourbron; Klaus-Peter Lodemann; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  A comparison of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-DOTA for contrast-enhanced MRI of intracranial tumours.

Authors:  C Colosimo; M V Knopp; X Barreau; E Gérardin; M A Kirchin; F Guézénoc; K P Lodemann
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  [Contrast agents in MRT. Substance, effects, pharmacology and validity].

Authors:  P Reimer; R Vosshenrich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  MR angiography with blood pool contrast agents.

Authors:  Jens Bremerich; Deniz Bilecen; Peter Reimer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms at 3T: comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  N Anzalone; F Scomazzoni; M Cirillo; C Righi; F Simionato; M Cadioli; A Iadanza; M A Kirchin; G Scotti
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.