Literature DB >> 12446984

Power and sample size calculations for case-control genetic association tests when errors are present: application to single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Derek Gordon1, Stephen J Finch, Michael Nothnagel, Jürg Ott.   

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to quantify the effects that errors in genotyping have on power and the sample size necessary to maintain constant asymptotic Type I and Type II error rates (SSN) for case-control genetic association studies between a disease phenotype and a di-allelic marker locus, for example a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) locus. We consider the effects of three published models of genotyping errors on the chi-square test for independence in the 2 x 3 table. After specifying genotype frequencies for the marker locus conditional on disease status and error model in both a genetic model-based and a genetic model-free framework, we compute the asymptotic power to detect association through specification of the test's non-centrality parameter. This parameter determines the functional dependence of SSN on the genotyping error rates. Additionally, we study the dependence of SSN on linkage disequilibrium (LD), marker allele frequencies, and genotyping error rates for a dominant disease model. Increased genotyping error rate requires a larger SSN. Every 1% increase in sum of genotyping error rates requires that both case and control SSN be increased by 2-8%, with the extent of increase dependent upon the error model. For the dominant disease model, SSN is a nonlinear function of LD and genotyping error rate, with greater SSN for lower LD and higher genotyping error rate. The combination of lower LD and higher genotyping error rates requires a larger SSN than the sum of the SSN for the lower LD and for the higher genotyping error rate. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12446984     DOI: 10.1159/000066696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  88 in total

Review 1.  "Are we there yet?": Deciding when one has demonstrated specific genetic causation in complex diseases and quantitative traits.

Authors:  Grier P Page; Varghese George; Rodney C Go; Patricia Z Page; David B Allison
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Assessing the impact of non-differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.

Authors:  Scott Powers; Shyam Gopalakrishnan; Nathan Tintle
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 0.444

3.  Lack of association between ADRA2B-4825 gene insertion/deletion polymorphism and migraine in Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Jian-Qiang Ni; Sha-Sha Jia; Min Liu; Shou-Gong Chen; Yu-Ting Jiang; Wan-Li Dong; Yu-Zhen Gao
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.203

4.  A C17T polymorphism in the mu opiate receptor is associated with quantitative measures of drug use in African American women.

Authors:  Howard A Crystal; Sara Hamon; Matthew Randesi; Judith Cook; Kathryn Anastos; Jason Lazar; Chenglong Liu; Leigh Pearce; Elizabeth Golub; Victor Valcour; Kathleen M Weber; Susan Holman; Ann Ho; Mary Jeanne Kreek
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.280

5.  IL-18R1 and IL-18RAP SNPs may be associated with bronchopulmonary dysplasia in African-American infants.

Authors:  Joanna Floros; Douglas Londono; Derek Gordon; Patricia Silveyra; Susan L Diangelo; Rose M Viscardi; George S Worthen; Jeffrey Shenberger; Guirong Wang; Zhenwu Lin; Neal J Thomas
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.756

6.  IL-10 promoter single nucleotide polymorphisms are significantly associated with resistance to leprosy.

Authors:  Dheeraj Malhotra; Katayoon Darvishi; Soni Sood; Swarkar Sharma; Chander Grover; Vineet Relhan; B S N Reddy; R N K Bamezai
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Detection of genotyping errors and pseudo-SNPs via deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

Authors:  Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 8.  Factors affecting statistical power in the detection of genetic association.

Authors:  Derek Gordon; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Genotyping error detection in samples of unrelated individuals without replicate genotyping.

Authors:  Nianjun Liu; Dabao Zhang; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 0.444

10.  Deviations from hardy-weinberg equilibrium in parental and unaffected sibling genotype data.

Authors:  Bingshan Li; Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 0.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.