Literature DB >> 31664489

The left cerebral hemisphere may be dominant for the control of bimanual symmetric reach-to-grasp movements.

Jarrod Blinch1,2, Jason W Flindall3,4, Łukasz Smaga5, Kwanghee Jung6, Claudia Lr Gonzalez3.   

Abstract

Previous research has established that the left cerebral hemisphere is dominant for the control of continuous bimanual movements. The lateralisation of motor control for discrete bimanual movements, in contrast, is underexplored. The purpose of the current study was to investigate which (if either) hemisphere is dominant for discrete bimanual movements. Twenty-one participants made bimanual reach-to-grasp movements towards pieces of candy. Participants grasped the candy to either place it in their mouths (grasp-to-eat) or in a receptacle near their mouths (grasp-to-place). Research has shown smaller maximum grip apertures (MGAs) for unimanual grasp-to-eat movements than unimanual grasp-to-place movements when controlled by the left hemisphere. In Experiment 1, participants made bimanual symmetric movements where both hands made grasp-to-eat or grasp-to-place movements. We hypothesised that a left hemisphere dominance for bimanual movements would cause smaller MGAs in both hands during bimanual grasp-to-eat movements compared to those in bimanual grasp-to-place movements. The results revealed that MGAs were indeed smaller for bimanual grasp-to-eat movements than grasp-to-place movements. This supports that the left hemisphere may be dominant for the control of bimanual symmetric movements, which agrees with studies on continuous bimanual movements. In Experiment 2, participants made bimanual asymmetric movements where one hand made a grasp-to-eat movement while the other hand made a grasp-to-place movement. The results failed to support the potential predictions of left hemisphere dominance, right hemisphere dominance, or contralateral control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discrete bimanual movements; Grasp-to-eat; Grasp-to-place; Lateralisation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31664489     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05672-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  66 in total

1.  A performance measure of the degree of hand preference.

Authors:  P J Bryden; K M Pryde; E A Roy
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Intermanual interactions in discrete and periodic bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Wolfhard Klein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Handedness-related asymmetry in coupling strength in bimanual coordination: furthering theory and evidence.

Authors:  Harjo J de Poel; C Lieke E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2006-06-14

4.  Laterally focused attention modulates asymmetric coupling in rhythmic interlimb coordination.

Authors:  Harjo J de Poel; C Lieke E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-10-05

5.  Asymmetric interlimb interference during the performance of a dynamic bimanual task.

Authors:  C B Walter; S P Swinnen
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 6.  On the other hand: including left-handers in cognitive neuroscience and neurogenetics.

Authors:  Roel M Willems; Lise Van der Haegen; Simon E Fisher; Clyde Francks
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; M Jeannerod; S Athenes; C Dugas
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-09

8.  Symmetrical and asymmetrical influences on force production in 1:2 and 2:1 bimanual force coordination tasks.

Authors:  Deanna M Kennedy; Joohyun Rhee; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Left-handers and right-handers compared on performance and preference measures of lateral dominance.

Authors:  J C Borod; H S Caron; E Koff
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1984-05

10.  Wait wait, don't tell me: Handedness questionnaires do not predict hand preference for grasping.

Authors:  Jason W Flindall; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2018-07-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  Precrastination and individual differences in working memory capacity.

Authors:  Nisha Raghunath; Lisa R Fournier; Clark Kogan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-20

2.  Bimanual coordination during reach-to-grasp actions is sensitive to task goal with distinctions between left- and right-hemispheric stroke.

Authors:  Tessa Johnson; Gordon Ridgeway; Dustin Luchmee; Joshua Jacob; Shailesh Kantak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Hand pose selection in a bimanual fine-manipulation task.

Authors:  Kunpeng Yao; Dagmar Sternad; Aude Billard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.714

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.