Literature DB >> 16331509

Disruption of bilateral temporal coordination during arm swinging in patients with hemiparesis.

K I Ustinova1, J Fung, M F Levin.   

Abstract

Persistent motor deficits in the paretic arm present a major barrier to the recovery of the ability to perform bimanual tasks even in individuals who have recovered well after a stroke. Impaired performance may be related to deficits in bimanual temporal coordination due to stroke-related damage of specific brain motor structures as well as changed biomechanics of the paretic arm. To determine the extent of the deficit in bilateral temporal coordination after the stroke, we investigated how bilateral reciprocal coordination was regained after external perturbations of the arm in individuals with hemiparesis due to stroke. We used a bilateral task that would be minimally affected by the unilateral arm motor deficit. Nine non-disabled control subjects and 12 individuals with chronic hemiparesis performed reciprocal (anti-phase) arm swinging in the standing position for 15 s per trial. In each trial, movement of one arm was unexpectedly and transiently (approximately 150-350 ms) arrested at the level of the wrist once in the forward and once in the backward phase of swinging. Perturbation was applied to the left and right arms in control subjects and to the paretic and non-paretic arms of individuals with hemiparesis. Kinematic data from endpoint markers on both hands and electromyographic activity of anterior and posterior deltoid muscles from both arms were recorded. The oscillatory period, the phase differences between arms and the mean EMG activity before, during and after perturbation were analyzed. In both groups the perturbation altered the period of the perturbed cycle in both the arrested and non-arrested arms and resulted in a change from anti-phase to in-phase coordination, following which anti-phase coordination was regained. Recovery of anti-phase swinging took significantly longer in patients with hemiparesis compared to control subjects. Stable pre-perturbed (anti-phase) reciprocal coordination was regained within one cycle following perturbation for the control subjects and within two cycles following perturbation for the patients with hemiparesis. Analysis of EMG activation levels showed that, compared to control subjects, there was significantly less activation of the shoulder muscles in response to perturbation in the patient group and the pattern of muscle activation in the paretic arm was opposite to that in the non-paretic and control arms. The finding that patients had a reduced capacity for maintaining and restoring the required reciprocal coordination when perturbation occurred suggests that stroke-related brain damage in our patients led to instability of bilateral temporal coordination for this rhythmical task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16331509     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0136-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  42 in total

1.  The Timing of Intralimb Coordination.

Authors:  Richard G. Carson; Stephan Riek; Winston D. Byblow
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Neural control of rhythmic, cyclical human arm movement: task dependency, nerve specificity and phase modulation of cutaneous reflexes.

Authors:  E P Zehr; A Kido
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Kinematics of a coordinated goal-directed bimanual task.

Authors:  O Kazennikov; S Perrig; M Wiesendanger
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2002-08-21       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The importance of the dominant hemisphere in the organization of bimanual movements.

Authors:  Deborah J Serrien; Michael J Cassidy; Peter Brown
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  The neuronal basis of bimanual coordination: recent neurophysiological evidence and functional models.

Authors:  Simone Cardoso de Oliveira
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2002-06

6.  Dynamometric assessment of the plantarflexors in hemiparetic subjects: relations between muscular, gait and clinical parameters.

Authors:  S Nadeau; D Gravel; A B Arsenault; D Bourbonnais; M Goyette
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1997-09

Review 7.  Central pattern generators for locomotion, with special reference to vertebrates.

Authors:  S Grillner; P Wallén
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Supplementary motor area of the monkey's cerebral cortex: short- and long-term deficits after unilateral ablation and the effects of subsequent callosal section.

Authors:  C Brinkman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Neural control of locomotion; The central pattern generator from cats to humans.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Simple and complex movements in a patient with infarction of the right supplementary motor area.

Authors:  J P Dick; R Benecke; J C Rothwell; B L Day; C D Marsden
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 10.338

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Bilateral arm training: why and who benefits?

Authors:  Sandy McCombe Waller; Jill Whitall
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.138

2.  Bilateral coupling facilitates recovery of rhythmical movements from perturbation in healthy and post-stroke subjects.

Authors:  Ksenia I Ustinova; Anatol G Feldman; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Age- and stroke-related skeletal muscle changes: a review for the geriatric clinician.

Authors:  Jaclyn Megan Sions; Christine M Tyrell; Brian A Knarr; Angela Jancosko; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.381

4.  Bimanual training in stroke: How do coupling and symmetry-breaking matter?

Authors:  Rita Sleimen-Malkoun; Jean-Jacques Temprado; Laurent Thefenne; Eric Berton
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 5.  Bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress: a structured review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  James H Cauraugh; Neha Lodha; Sagar K Naik; Jeffery J Summers
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Markedly impaired bilateral coordination of gait in post-stroke patients: Is this deficit distinct from asymmetry? A cohort study.

Authors:  Ronald Meijer; Meir Plotnik; Esther Groot Zwaaftink; Rob C van Lummel; Erik Ainsworth; Juan D Martina; Jeffrey M Hausdorff
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Construct Validity of the Upper-Limb Interlimb Coordination Test in Stroke.

Authors:  Roni Molad; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Comparing unilateral and bilateral upper limb training: the ULTRA-stroke program design.

Authors:  A Lex E Q van Delden; C Lieke E Peper; Jaap Harlaar; Andreas Daffertshofer; Nienke I Zijp; Kirsten Nienhuys; Peter Koppe; Gert Kwakkel; Peter J Beek
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.474

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.