Literature DB >> 12439265

The causes of insert backside wear in total knee arthroplasty.

Ray C Wasielewski1.   

Abstract

Wear of the insert backside occurs ostensibly because of micromotion at the undersurface articulation that occurs with loading. When a cyclic axial load was applied to contemporary knee implants, all inserts tested moved 2 to 25 microm in the shear plane relative to the metal backing suggesting that undersurface motion may be inevitable. Variables that increase the forces between the insert and metal backing can worsen relative micromotion and backside wear. Forces at the undersurface articulation, created during physiologic loading, are influenced by insert type, articular design, and surgical technique. Increasing articular insert constraint can cause forces at the main articulation to be resisted and transferred to this and the other interfaces. Designs with a cam post mechanism that force rollback at a certain flexion angle create a significant force in this shear plane. Inserts with highly conforming articular geometries can have a similar affect if used to inhibit anteroposterior or mediolateral motion of the femur on the tibial insert. Component alignment and position, and ligament balance also may influence backside wear as suggested by the great variability of wear patterns seen on like insert retrievals and by kinematic differences observed in fluoroscopic studies of the same implant design. Only by understanding these potential causes of backside motion and subsequent wear, can backside wear be mitigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12439265     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  13 in total

1.  Surface damage versus tibial polyethylene insert conformity: a retrieval study.

Authors:  Markus A Wimmer; Michel P Laurent; Jeannie D Haman; Joshua J Jacobs; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  In vivo oxidation contributes to delamination but not pitting in polyethylene components for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francisco J Medel; Steven M Kurtz; Javad Parvizi; Gregg R Klein; Matthew J Kraay; Clare M Rimnac
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Comparison among total knee arthroplasties with a mobile bearing: menisci versus rotating platform versus AP glide platform.

Authors:  Giuseppe Solarino; Andrea Luca; Luigi Marzo; Lorenzo Scialpi; Giovanni B Solarino
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-06-27

4.  Mid-term results with a highly congruous mobile-bearing knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Roger G Lemaire
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Long-term outcome of low contact stress total knee arthroplasty with different mobile bearing designs.

Authors:  Giuseppe Solarino; Antonio Spinarelli; Massimiliano Carrozzo; Andrea Piazzolla; Giovanni Vicenti; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-08-01

6.  Post-cam mechanics and tibiofemoral kinematics: a dynamic in vitro analysis of eight posterior-stabilized total knee designs.

Authors:  N Arnout; L Vanlommel; J Vanlommel; J P Luyckx; L Labey; B Innocenti; J Victor; J Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Polished trays reduce backside wear independent of post location in posterior-stabilized TKAs.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Mark W Gesell; Christen W Hoedt; Kathleen N Meyers; Timothy M Wright; Steven B Haas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Tibial component coverage and rotational alignment accuracy after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yoshinori Ishii; Hideo Noguchi; Junko Sato; Hana Ishii; Koji Todoroki; Shin-Ichi Toyabe
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-10

9.  CORR Insights®: Current Total Knee Designs: Does Baseplate Roughness or Locking Mechanism Design Affect Polyethylene Backside Wear?

Authors:  Edward Ebramzadeh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Current Total Knee Designs: Does Baseplate Roughness or Locking Mechanism Design Affect Polyethylene Backside Wear?

Authors:  Zachary W Sisko; Matthew G Teeter; Brent A Lanting; James L Howard; Richard W McCalden; Douglas D Naudie; Steven J MacDonald; Edward M Vasarhelyi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.