Literature DB >> 12433407

DPOAE level shifts and ABR threshold shifts compared to detailed analysis of histopathological damage from noise.

Gary W Harding1, Barbara A Bohne, Mueed Ahmad.   

Abstract

A detailed comparison of 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level shifts (LS) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) threshold shifts with noise-induced histopathology was conducted in chinchillas. DPOAE levels (i.e., L(1) and L(2)) at f(1) and f(2), respectively, ranged from 55-75 dB sound pressure level (SPL), with f(2)/f(1)=1.23, 6 points/octave, f(2)=0.41-20 kHz, and ABR thresholds at 0.5-20 kHz, 2 points/octave, were determined pre-exposure. The exposure was a 108 dB SPL octave band of noise centered at 4 kHz (1-1.75 h, n=6) or 80-86 dB SPL (24 h, n=5). DPOAE LSs (magnitude pre- minus post-exposure) and ABR threshold shifts (TS) were determined at 0 days and up to 28 days post-exposure. The cochleae were fixed, embedded in plastic and dissected into flat preparations. The length of the organ of Corti (OC) was measured; missing inner (IHC) and outer (OHC) hair cells counted; stereocilia damage rated; and regions of OC and nerve-fiber loss determined. Cytocochleograms were made showing functional loss and structural damage with the LS and TS overlaid. Some unexpected results were obtained. First, the best correlation of LS with histopathology required plotting the DPOAE data at f(1) with respect to the chinchilla-place map. The best correlation of TS was with IHC and nerve-fiber loss. Second, wide regions of up to 10% scattered OHC loss in the apical half of the OC showed little or no LS. Third, with the 108 dB SPL noise, there was 20-40 dB of recovery for DPOAEs at mid-high frequencies (3-10 kHz) in eight of 12 cochleae where there was 70-100% OHC loss in the basal half of the OC. The largest recovery at mid-high frequencies occurred in regions where the OC was entirely missing. Fourth, with the 80-86 dB SPL noise, there was no LS at small focal lesions (100% loss of OHCs over 0.4 mm) when the frequency place of either f(1) or f(2) was within the lesion but not both. There was no correlation of LS with OHC stereocilia loss, fusion or disarray. These results suggest that, after noise exposure, DPOAEs at mid-high frequencies can originate from or be augmented by generators located at someplace other than the frequency place of f(2), possibly the basal 20% of the OC when this region is intact. Also, noise-induced DPOAE LSs seemed to reflect differing mechanisms for temporary and permanent hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12433407     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00653-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  21 in total

Review 1.  The potential role of endogenous stem cells in regeneration of the inner ear.

Authors:  Rodrigo Martinez-Monedero; Kazuo Oshima; Stefan Heller; Albert S B Edge
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Local cochlear damage reduces local nonlinearity and decreases generator-type cochlear emissions while increasing reflector-type emissions.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Elizabeth S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27

4.  Regenerated synapses between postnatal hair cells and auditory neurons.

Authors:  Mingjie Tong; Aurore Brugeaud; Albert S B Edge
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-20

5.  Predicting the location of missing outer hair cells using the electrical signal recorded at the round window.

Authors:  Mark E Chertoff; Brian R Earl; Francisco J Diaz; Janna L Sorensen; Megan L A Thomas; Aryn M Kamerer; Marcello Peppi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-18

7.  Reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Rama Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Evidence for basal distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Sensitive measures of tympanic -membrane perforation and healing processes in a gerbil model.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Glenna Stomackin; Xiaohui Lin; Glen K Martin; Timothy T Jung
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Drug delivery into the cochlear apex: Improved control to sequentially affect finely spaced regions along the entire length of the cochlear spiral.

Authors:  J T Lichtenhan; J Hartsock; J R Dornhoffer; K M Donovan; A N Salt
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.