Literature DB >> 12431929

Teaching digital rectal examinations to medical students: an evaluation study of teaching methods.

Cathy Popadiuk1, Madge Pottle, Vernon Curran.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The digital rectal examination (DRE) is a necessary part of a complete physical examination and evaluation of a patient, yet teaching of this examination to medical students is often inadequate. This study was a comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of the rectal teaching associate (RTA), lecture, role-playing, and simulated models as methods for teaching the DRE procedure to undergraduate medical students at Memorial University of Newfoundland Faculty of Medicine.
METHOD: A total of 65 third-year medical students were randomly assigned to either an experimental or control group. Both groups received a lecture and practiced the DRE on a simulated model. The experimental group received further training from an RTA. Students completed a pre- and post-intervention knowledge assessment, an objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) measuring performance of the DRE, and a satisfaction survey.
RESULTS: Mean knowledge scores increased significantly for both groups (18.73 to 22.32, p <.0001). The control group scored significantly higher on the post-intervention assessment than did the experimental group (23.11 versus 21.47, p =.025) The experimental group scored higher on the OSCE (27.52 versus 23.80, p =.001) and rated the RTA as a more effective method for learning the DRE.
CONCLUSIONS: This first study using RTAs to teach the DRE as a global skill for evaluating the rectum suggests that the RTA method is effective for increasing skills and students' confidence in the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12431929     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  12 in total

1.  Digital rectal examination: national survey of undergraduate medical training in Ireland.

Authors:  Deirdre Fitzgerald; Stephen S Connolly; Michael J Kerin
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  A survey of digital rectal examination training in Canadian medical schools.

Authors:  Alysha Nensi; Nilesh Chande
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  A phase II clinical study to assess the feasibility of self and partner anal examinations to detect anal canal abnormalities including anal cancer.

Authors:  Alan G Nyitray; Joseph T Hicks; Lu-Yu Hwang; Sarah Baraniuk; Margaret White; Stefanos Millas; Nkechi Onwuka; Xiaotao Zhang; Eric L Brown; Michael W Ross; Elizabeth Y Chiao
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation in teaching digital rectal examination: a systematic review narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Mansour A Al Asmri; James Ennis; Robert John Stone; Fernando Bello; M Sayeed Haque; Jim Parle
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-08-01

Review 5.  Pediatric Rectal Exam: Why, When, and How.

Authors:  Susan R Orenstein; Arnold Wald
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-01

6.  Peer-assisted learning and orthopaedic evaluation psychomotor skills.

Authors:  Thomas G Weidner; Jennifer K Popp
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Digital rectal examination skills: first training experiences, the motives and attitudes of standardized patients.

Authors:  Christoph Nikendei; Katja Diefenbacher; Nadja Köhl-Hackert; Heike Lauber; Julia Huber; Anne Herrmann-Werner; Wolfgang Herzog; Jobst-Hendrik Schultz; Jana Jünger; Markus Krautter
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Digital rectal examination standardization for inexperienced hands: teaching medical students.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira Reis; Antonio Felipe Leite Simão; Jamal Baracat; Fernandes Denardi; Antonio Gugliotta
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2013-09-19

9.  Simulated learning in musculoskeletal assessment and rehabilitation education: comparing the effect of a simulation-based learning activity with a peer-based learning activity.

Authors:  Mark Hecimovich; Simone Volet
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Medical students' experiences learning intimate physical examination skills: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Andra M Dabson; Parker J Magin; Gaynor Heading; Dimity Pond
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.