Literature DB >> 28835533

A phase II clinical study to assess the feasibility of self and partner anal examinations to detect anal canal abnormalities including anal cancer.

Alan G Nyitray1, Joseph T Hicks1, Lu-Yu Hwang1, Sarah Baraniuk2, Margaret White3, Stefanos Millas4, Nkechi Onwuka5, Xiaotao Zhang5, Eric L Brown1, Michael W Ross6, Elizabeth Y Chiao7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anal cancer is a common cancer among men who have sex with men (MSM); however, there is no standard screening protocol for anal cancer. We conducted a phase II clinical trial to assess the feasibility of teaching MSM to recognise palpable masses in the anal canal which is a common sign of anal cancer in men.
METHODS: A clinician skilled in performing digital anorectal examinations (DARE) used a pelvic manikin to train 200 MSM, aged 27-78 years, how to do a self-anal examination (SAE) for singles or a partner anal examination (PAE) for couples. The clinician then performed a DARE without immediately disclosing results, after which the man or couple performed an SAE or PAE, respectively. Percentage agreement with the clinician DARE in addition to sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for the SAE, PAE and overall.
RESULTS: Men had a median age of 52 years, 42.5% were African American and 60.5% were HIV positive. DARE detected abnormalities in 12 men while the men's SAE/PAEs detected 9 of these. A total of 93.0% of men classified the health of their anal canal correctly (95% CI 89.5 to 96.5). Overall percentage agreement, sensitivity and specificity were 93.0%, 75.0% and 94.2%, respectively, while PPV and NPV were 45.0% and 98.3%, respectively. The six men who detected the abnormality had nodules/masses ≥3 mm in size. More than half of men (60.5%) reported never checking their anus for an abnormality; however, after performing an SAE/PAE, 93.0% said they would repeat it in the future.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that tumours of ≥3 mm may be detectable by self or partner palpation among MSM and encourage further investigation given literature suggesting a high cure rate for anal cancer tumours ≤10 mm. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV; anal canal; anus neoplasms; digital rectal examination; early detection of cancer; homosexuality; male

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28835533      PMCID: PMC6173609          DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  27 in total

1.  Teaching digital rectal examinations to medical students: an evaluation study of teaching methods.

Authors:  Cathy Popadiuk; Madge Pottle; Vernon Curran
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Anal cancer prevention: how we are failing men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Ross D Cranston
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Screening for testicular cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Anal human papillomavirus infection and associated neoplastic lesions in men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dorothy A Machalek; Mary Poynten; Fengyi Jin; Christopher K Fairley; Annabelle Farnsworth; Suzanne M Garland; Richard J Hillman; Kathy Petoumenos; Jennifer Roberts; Sepehr N Tabrizi; David J Templeton; Andrew E Grulich
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Condylomata, cytological abnormalities and human papillomavirus infection in the anal canal in HIV-infected men.

Authors:  L Darwich; M P Cañadas; S Videla; J Coll; M Piñol; P Cobarsi; R A Molina-López; S Vela; F García-Cuyás; M Llatjos; G Sirera; B Clotet
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.180

6.  Evaluation and Management of Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in HIV-Negative and HIV-Positive Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Authors:  Ina U Park; Joel M Palefsky
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Self-collected versus clinician-collected anal cytology specimens to diagnose anal intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive men.

Authors:  Ross D Cranston; Teresa M Darragh; Elizabeth A Holly; Naomi Jay; J Michael Berry; Maria Da Costa; Jimmy T Efird; Joel M Palefsky
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 8.  Anal cancer screening in men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Paul Fox
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.283

9.  Exploring anal self-examination as a means of screening for anal cancer in HIV positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jason J Ong; Meredith Temple-Smith; Marcus Chen; Sandra Walker; Andrew Grulich; Christopher K Fairley
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Cost-effectiveness of screening for anal cancer using regular digital ano-rectal examinations in men who have sex with men living with HIV.

Authors:  Jason J Ong; Christopher K Fairley; Susan Carroll; Sandra Walker; Marcus Chen; Tim Read; Andrew Grulich; Catriona Bradshaw; John Kaldor; Philip Clarke
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 5.396

View more
  10 in total

1.  A qualitative investigation among men who have sex with men on the acceptability of performing a self- or partner anal exam to screen for anal cancer.

Authors:  Seyram A Butame; Sylvia Lawler; Joseph T Hicks; J Michael Wilkerson; Lu-Yu Hwang; Sarah Baraniuk; Michael W Ross; Elizabeth Yu Chiao; Alan G Nyitray
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Anal Cancer Screening for HIV-Negative Men Who Have Sex with Men: Making Clinical Decisions with Limited Data.

Authors:  Michael A Fuchs; Ami G Multani; Kenneth H Mayer; Alex S Keuroghlian
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.151

3.  Gay and Bisexual Men Who Report Anal Sex Stigma Alongside Discomfort Discussing Anal Sex with Health Workers Are Less Likely to Have Ever Received an Anal Examination or Anal Swab.

Authors:  Bryan A Kutner; Jane M Simoni; Will DeWitt; Michael M Gaisa; Theodorus G M Sandfort
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  A cross-sectional survey on attitudes of men who have sex with men towards anal self-examination for detection of anal syphilis.

Authors:  Ei T Aung; Christopher K Fairley; Jason J Ong; Tiffany R Phillips; Marcus Y Chen; Julien Tran; Kate Maddaford; Elena R Rodriguez; Eric P F Chow
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Incorporating digital anorectal examinations for anal cancer screening into routine HIV care for men who have sex with men living with HIV: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jason J Ong; Sandra Walker; Andrew Grulich; Jennifer Hoy; Tim Rh Read; Catriona Bradshaw; Marcus Chen; Suzanne M Garland; Richard Hillman; David J Templeton; Jane Hocking; Beng Eu; Bian Kiem Tee; Eric P F Chow; Christopher K Fairley
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.396

6.  Preferences of men who have sex with men for performing anal self-examination for the detection of anal syphilis in Australia: A discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Ei T Aung; Eric P F Chow; Christopher K Fairley; Tiffany R Phillips; Marcus Y Chen; Julien Tran; Kate Maddaford; Elena R Rodriguez; Jason J Ong
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2022-02-23

7.  Adherence to weekly anal self-examination among men who have sex with men for detection of anal syphilis.

Authors:  Ei T Aung; Christopher K Fairley; Jason J Ong; Tiffany P Phillips; Julien Tran; Marcus Y Chen; Kate Maddaford; Eric P F Chow
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-01

8.  Anal Cancer and Anal Cancer Screening Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Risk Among Women Living With HIV.

Authors:  Serena A Rodriguez; Robin T Higashi; Andrea C Betts; Cynthia Ortiz; Jasmin A Tiro; Amneris E Luque; Arti Barnes
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.842

9.  Trends in Risks for Second Primary Cancers Associated With Index Human Papillomavirus-Associated Cancers.

Authors:  Ryan Suk; Parag Mahale; Kalyani Sonawane; Andrew G Sikora; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Kathleen M Schmeler; Keith Sigel; Scott B Cantor; Elizabeth Y Chiao; Ashish A Deshmukh
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-09-07

10.  Do we really need guidelines for HRA during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Authors:  M Mistrangelo; G Naldini; M Morino
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.788

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.