Literature DB >> 12429290

Improved prostate cancer-specific survival and other disease parameters: impact of prostate-specific antigen testing.

Edmond L Paquette1, Leon Sun, Laurence R Paquette, Roger Connelly, David G Mcleod, Judd W Moul.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine how the implementation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing has affected disease-specific survival and other characteristics of prostate cancer.
METHODS: Data were collected on all patients with prostate cancer diagnosed between 1988 and 1998 and registered in the Center for Prostate Disease Research Database at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Statistical analyses were used to summarize trends over time in survival, mortality, and clinical stage.
RESULTS: Between 1988 and 1998, a total of 2042 patients with prostate cancer were registered at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 86.9% and 93.7% for patients diagnosed in the respective year groups of 1988 to 1991 and 1992 to 1994, with follow-up through December 1, 2000 (P < 0.001). Prostate cancer was the cause of death for 37.5% of the patients in 1988 to 1989 versus 15.4% in 1999 to 2000. Marked stage migration has occurred; from 1988 to 1998, the percentage of patients presenting with metastatic disease decreased from 14.1% to 3.3% (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant improved 5-year disease-specific survival and a decreased chance of dying from prostate cancer has occurred after the widespread implementation of PSA. We suspect that PSA testing has resulted in fewer patients presenting with metastatic disease and more patients presenting with localized disease amenable to curative treatment. This portends well for the use of PSA screening to improve outcomes for prostate cancer. However, randomized trials are needed to confirm the improvements in survival and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12429290     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01960-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  19 in total

Review 1.  Optimal cost-effective staging evaluations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gregory L Lacy; Douglas W Soderdahl; Javier Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Sunitinib plus androgen deprivation and radiation therapy for patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer: results from a multi-institutional phase 1 study.

Authors:  Paul G Corn; Danny Y Song; Elisabeth Heath; Jordan Maier; Raymond Meyn; Deborah Kuban; Thomas A DePetrillo; Paul Mathew
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  What if I don't treat my PSA-detected prostate cancer? Answers from three natural history models.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Elisabeth M Wever; Alex Tsodikov; David F Penson; Lurdes Y T Inoue; Jeffrey Katcher; Shih-Yuan Lee; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Gerrit Draisma; Harry J de Koning; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Change in prostate cancer grade over time in men followed expectantly for stage T1c disease.

Authors:  Todd B Sheridan; H Ballentine Carter; Wenle Wang; Patricia B Landis; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Assays for prostate cancer : changing the screening paradigm?

Authors:  Jens Hansen; Michael Rink; Markus Graefen; Shahrokh Shariat; Felix K-H Chun
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.074

6.  Prostate-cancer mortality in the USA and UK in 1975-2004: an ecological study.

Authors:  Simon M Collin; Richard M Martin; Chris Metcalfe; David Gunnell; Peter C Albertsen; David Neal; Freddie Hamdy; Peter Stephens; J Athene Lane; Rollo Moore; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Clinical and pathological characteristics of screen-detected versus clinically diagnosed prostate cancer in Nanjing, China.

Authors:  LiXin Hua; Di Qiao; Bin Xu; NingHan Feng; Gong Cheng; JieXiu Zhang; NingHong Song; Wei Zhang; Jie Yang; JianGang Chen; YuanGeng Sui; HongFei Wu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 8.  The role of biomarkers in the assessment of prostate cancer risk prior to prostate biopsy: which markers matter and how should they be used?

Authors:  Marianne Schmid; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Markus Graefen; Margit Fisch; Felix K Chun; Jens Hansen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Biomarkers in prostate cancer: what's new?

Authors:  David A Sartori; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.645

10.  Family history of prostate cancer and the incidence of ERG- and phosphatase and tensin homolog-defined prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dana Hashim; Amparo G Gonzalez-Feliciano; Thomas U Ahearn; Andreas Pettersson; Lauren Barber; Claire H Pernar; Ericka M Ebot; Masis Isikbay; Stephen P Finn; Edward L Giovannucci; Rosina T Lis; Massimo Loda; Giovanni Parmigiani; Tamara Lotan; Philip W Kantoff; Lorelei A Mucci; Rebecca E Graff
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 7.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.