Literature DB >> 12419624

The relationship between porosity and fatigue characteristics of bone cements.

N J Dunne1, J F Orr, M T Mushipe, R J Eveleigh.   

Abstract

In this study, the fatigue strengths of acrylic cement prepared by various commercially available reduced pressure mixing systems were compared with the fatigue strength of cement mixed by hand (control) under atmospheric conditions. The following observations were made from this investigation. The mean fatigue strength of reduced pressure mixed acrylic bone cement is double that of cement mixed by hand using an open bowl, 11,354+/-6,441 cycles to failure for reduced pressure mixing in comparison with 5,938+/-3,199 cycles for mixing under atmospheric conditions. However, the variability in mean fatigue strengths of reduced pressure mixed bone cement is greater for some mixing devices. The variation in fatigue strengths for the different mixing techniques is explained by the different porosity distributions. The design of the reduced pressure mixing system and the technique employed during mixing strongly contribute to the porosity distribution within the acrylic bone cement. The level of reduced pressure applied during cement mixing has an effect on the fatigue strength of bone cement, but the mixing mechanism is significantly more influential.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12419624     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00296-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of a three-dimensional measurement technique for the porosity evaluation of PMMA bone cement.

Authors:  Benjamin D Cox; Ruth K Wilcox; Martin C Levesley; Richard M Hall
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Analysis of rheological properties of bone cements.

Authors:  M K D Nicholas; M G J Waters; K M Holford; G Adusei
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Nonparametric pore size distribution using d-PFG: comparison to s-PFG and migration to MRI.

Authors:  Dan Benjamini; Michal E Komlosh; Peter J Basser; Uri Nevo
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Optimisation of a two-liquid component pre-filled acrylic bone cement system: a design of experiments approach to optimise cement final properties.

Authors:  James Clements; Gavin Walker; Sreekanth Pentlavalli; Nicholas Dunne
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Fatigue crack propagation under variable amplitude loading in PMMA and bone cement.

Authors:  S L Evans
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Evaluation of Different Experience Levels of Orthopaedic Residents Effect on Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Bone Cement Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Jonathon M Struemph; Alexander C M Chong; Paul H Wooley
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

7.  Mechanical and thermal behaviour of an acrylic bone cement modified with a triblock copolymer.

Authors:  E Paz; J Abenojar; Y Ballesteros; F Forriol; N Dunne; J C Del Real
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Creep and fatigue behavior of a novel 2-component paste-like formulation of acrylic bone cements.

Authors:  Ulrike Köster; Raimund Jaeger; Mareike Bardts; Christian Wahnes; Hubert Büchner; Klaus-Dieter Kühn; Sebastian Vogt
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Fatigue failure of dentin-composite disks subjected to cyclic diametral compression.

Authors:  Yuping Li; Carola Carrera; Ruoqiong Chen; Jianying Li; Yungchung Chen; Patricia Lenton; Joel D Rudney; Robert S Jones; Conrado Aparicio; Alex Fok
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Mechanical Properties and Porosity of Acrylic Cement Bone Loaded with Alendronate Powder.

Authors:  Guo-Xin Qu; Zhi-Min Ying; Chen-Chen Zhao; Shi-Gui Yan; Xun-Zi Cai
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.738

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.