Literature DB >> 16691354

Assessment of a three-dimensional measurement technique for the porosity evaluation of PMMA bone cement.

Benjamin D Cox1, Ruth K Wilcox, Martin C Levesley, Richard M Hall.   

Abstract

In vitro testing of bone cement has historically resulted in the belief that porosity should be minimised to help reduce the risk of prosthesis failure through aseptic loosening. Traditional porosity measurement techniques rely on the analysis of a two dimensional representation of a three dimensional structure. However, with an increasing interest in the number, size and distribution of pores in bone cement, the reliability of a two dimensional approach is questionable. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of micro computed tomography (micro-CT) for the three dimensional measurement of bone cement porosity by comparison with two traditional techniques. Eighteen bone cement specimens were analysed for porosity using each technique. Levels of agreement between techniques were evaluated, and technique precision was assessed in terms of repeatability and sensitivity to changes in threshold. Micro-CT data was used to illustrate the effectiveness of predicting the porosity of a whole structure from a sample region; an approach often used with traditional techniques. In summary, poor agreement was found between all techniques. However, micro-CT was found to be significantly more repeatable and less sensitive to changes in threshold. The results demonstrated that porosity cannot be reliably determined using traditional techniques and that a large proportion of a specimen is required to provide an accurate porosity measurement.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16691354     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-006-8939-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  21 in total

1.  Effect of mixing technique on the properties of acrylic bone-cement: a comparison of syringe and bowl mixing systems.

Authors:  J M Wilkinson; R Eveleigh; A J Hamer; A Milne; A W Miles; I Stockley
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Effect of mixing method and storage temperature of cement constituents on the fatigue and porosity of acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  G Lewis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1999

3.  Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface.

Authors:  N E Bishop; S Ferguson; S Tepic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-05

4.  Is there any difference between vacuum mixing systems in reducing bone cement porosity?

Authors:  J S Wang; S Toksvig-Larsen; P Müller-Wille; H Franźen
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1996

5.  Effect of mixing method on selected properties of acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  G Lewis; J S Nyman; H H Trieu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1997

6.  Porosity in manually mixed bone cement.

Authors:  U Lindén
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Centrifugation as a method of improving tensile and fatigue properties of acrylic bone cement.

Authors:  D W Burke; E I Gates; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The dynamic volume changes of polymerising polymethyl methacrylate bone cement.

Authors:  Scott D Muller; Sarah M Green; Andrew W McCaskie
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-12

10.  Microstructural pathway of fracture in poly(methyl methacrylate) bone cement.

Authors:  L D Topoleski; P Ducheyne; J M Cuckler
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  1 in total

1.  Mechanical Properties and Porosity of Acrylic Cement Bone Loaded with Alendronate Powder.

Authors:  Guo-Xin Qu; Zhi-Min Ying; Chen-Chen Zhao; Shi-Gui Yan; Xun-Zi Cai
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.