Literature DB >> 12413559

Post-processing water-fat imaging technique for fat suppression in a low-field MR imaging system, evaluation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Kari Palosaari1, Osmo Tervonen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of the phase difference-based post-processing water-fat imaging method for fat suppression at low-field in imaging of arthritic joints.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty joints (wrist, 10; elbow, 10; knee, 10) in 30 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were imaged using a 0.23T MRI unit. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1w) three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo (GRE) images with and without fat suppression along with short inversion time inversion-recovery (STIR) images were evaluated by two radiologists. Contrast-enhanced T1w 3D GRE images and corresponding post-processed fat-suppressed images were scored for conspicuity and delineation of enhancing synovial hypertrophy. The uniformity of fat suppression was evaluated between T1w 3D GRE fat-suppressed images and STIR images, and general image quality was estimated for all of the three techniques by consensus. For a quantitative analysis, the enhancing synovial hypertrophy-to-fat contrast-to-noise (CNR) values for the T1W 3D GRE images with and without fat suppression were measured. For comparison, synovial bright signal-to-fat CNR values for the STIR images were measured.
RESULTS: The post-processing water-fat imaging technique for fat suppression was successfully applied in all examinations. Conspicuity and delineation of enhancing tissue were superior in fat-suppressed T1w 3D GRE images compared to non-fat-suppressed images (P < 0.0001). As expected, the enhancing synovial hypertrophy tissue-to-fat CNRs were significantly higher in fat-suppressed T1w 3D GRE images compared to non-fat-suppressed images (P < 0.0001). General image quality was assessed to be best in non-fat-suppressed images, and the difference was significant compared to fat-suppressed images (P < 0.05) and STIR images (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The phase difference-based post-processing water-fat imaging technique for fat suppression can be successfully used at low-field, and it provides high-quality fat suppression images in imaging of arthritic joints. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12413559     DOI: 10.1007/bf02693838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  35 in total

1.  Chemical shift artifact: dependence on shape and orientation of the lipid-water interface.

Authors:  R C Smith; R C Lange; S M McCarthy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder.

Authors:  J C Tsai; M B Zlatkin
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  True water and fat MR imaging with use of multiple-echo acquisition.

Authors:  S C Williams; M A Horsfield; L D Hall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Wrist and finger joint MR imaging in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Klarlund; M Ostergaard; P Gideon; K Sørensen; K E Jensen; I Lorenzen
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  STIR MR imaging of the orbit.

Authors:  S W Atlas; R I Grossman; D B Hackney; H I Goldberg; L T Bilaniuk; R A Zimmerman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Rotator cuff tendon tears: evaluation with fat-suppressed MR imaging with arthroscopic correlation in 100 patients.

Authors:  S F Quinn; R C Sheley; T A Demlow; J Szumowski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Unsuppressed fat in the right anterior diaphragmatic region on fat-suppressed T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR images.

Authors:  K Yoshimitsu; D G Varma; E F Jackson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  1H NMR chemical shift selective (CHESS) imaging.

Authors:  A Haase; J Frahm; W Hänicke; D Matthaei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  A spin echo chemical shift MR imaging technique.

Authors:  P M Joseph
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Nonspecificity of short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) as a technique of fat suppression: pitfalls in image interpretation.

Authors:  G Krinsky; N M Rofsky; J C Weinreb
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  2 in total

1.  Low-field versus high-field MRI in diagnosing breast disorders.

Authors:  Eija Pääkkö; Heli Reinikainen; Eija-Leena Lindholm; Tarja Rissanen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  MR-guided breast biopsy and hook wire marking using a low-field (0.23 T) scanner with optical instrument tracking.

Authors:  Roberto Blanco Sequeiros; Heli Reinikainen; Andreas M Blanco Sequeiros; Teuvo Vaara; Risto Ojala; Eija Pääkkö; Osmo Tervonen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.