Literature DB >> 7724773

Rotator cuff tendon tears: evaluation with fat-suppressed MR imaging with arthroscopic correlation in 100 patients.

S F Quinn1, R C Sheley, T A Demlow, J Szumowski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of fat-suppressed magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of rotator cuff tears in a large symptomatic population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients underwent both MR imaging and arthroscopy of the shoulder. Ninety-two patients underwent fat-suppressed conventional spin-echo MR imaging (repetition time msec/echo time msec = 2,500/20, 60), and eight patients underwent fat-suppressed, fast spin-echo MR imaging (2,000/80).
RESULTS: With data combined for complete and partial tears of the rotator cuff (n = 31), MR imaging had an accuracy of 93%; sensitivity, 84%; and specificity, 97%. Seventeen of 20 complete tears and nine of 11 partial tears were properly identified with MR imaging. Two partial tears were not detected and three complete tears were incorrectly called partial tears at MR imaging. Of two false-positive MR imaging findings, one was called a complete tear and the other, a partial tear.
CONCLUSION: Fat-suppressed MR imaging has high diagnostic accuracy in evaluating tears of the rotator cuff tendon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7724773     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.195.2.7724773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  18 in total

1.  Painful shoulder: comparison of physical examination and ultrasonographic findings.

Authors:  E Naredo; P Aguado; E De Miguel; J Uson; L Mayordomo; J Gijon-Baños; E Martin-Mola
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Post-processing water-fat imaging technique for fat suppression in a low-field MR imaging system, evaluation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Kari Palosaari; Osmo Tervonen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Rotator cuff tears: assessment with MR arthrography in 275 patients with arthroscopic correlation.

Authors:  S Waldt; M Bruegel; D Mueller; K Holzapfel; A B Imhoff; E J Rummeny; K Woertler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Supraspinatus tendon tears: comparison of 3D US and MR arthrography with surgical correlation.

Authors:  Chang Ho Kang; Sam Soo Kim; Jung Hyuk Kim; Kyoo Byung Chung; Yun Hwan Kim; Yu-Whan Oh; Woong-Kyo Jeong; Baek Hyun Kim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of rotator cuff tears using a microscopy coil: noninvasive detection without intraarticular contrast material.

Authors:  Shin Hitachi; Kei Takase; Minoru Tanaka; Yuichi Tojo; Shiro Tabata; Kazuhiro Majima; Shuichi Higano; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison of low-field (0.2 T) vs high-field (1.5 T) imaging.

Authors:  R Loew; K F Kreitner; M Runkel; J Zoellner; M Thelen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The Shoulder Pain due to Metastatic Breast Cancer -A Case Report-.

Authors:  Sae Young Kim; Min Woo Jung; Jin Mo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2011-06-07

8.  Comparisons of the various partial-thickness rotator cuff tears on MR arthrography and arthroscopic correlation.

Authors:  Kyung Ah Chun; Min Sung Kim; Young Joo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Predictors of success of corticosteroid injection for the management of rotator cuff disease.

Authors:  Fernando Contreras; Haydée C Brown; Robert G Marx
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-01-05

10.  Sonography of the painful shoulder: role of the operator's experience.

Authors:  Thomas Le Corroller; Michel Cohen; Richard Aswad; Vanessa Pauly; Pierre Champsaur
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.