Literature DB >> 12403665

Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era.

Niranjan Seshadri1, Patrick L Whitlow, Naveen Acharya, Penny Houghtaling, Eugene H Blackstone, Stephen G Ellis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the advent of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), technological advances, adjunctive pharmacotherapy, and increasing operator experience have contributed to lowering the occurrence of major complications. However, emergency coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) for failed PCI is still associated with important morbidity and mortality, even in the era of coronary stenting. We sought to determine the prevalence, indications, predictors, and complications of emergency CABG after PCI in the past decade. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We reviewed 18 593 PCIs performed from 1992 through 2000. There was a need for emergency CABG in 113 (0.61%) cases. The major indications were extensive dissection (n=61, 54%), perforation/tamponade (n=23, 20%), and recurrent acute closure (n=23, 20%). Prevalence of emergency CABG decreased from 1.5% of PCIs in 1992 to 0.14% in 2000 (P<0.001). Independent predictors of the need for emergency CABG included the worst ACC/AHA scoring of the intervened lesion (P<0.001) and female sex (P= 0.028), whereas history of prior bypass surgery and use of stents resulted in a decreased need for emergency CABG (P<0.001 for both). In patients undergoing emergency CABG, there were 17 (15%) in-hospital deaths, 14 (12%) perioperative Q-wave myocardial infarctions, and 6 (5%) cerebrovascular accidents.
CONCLUSIONS: The need for emergency CABG has considerably decreased over time. Risk factors include female sex and a higher ACC/AHA score of the intervened lesion. However, morbidity and mortality of emergency CABG remain high even in the new millennium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12403665     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000036595.92742.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  20 in total

Review 1.  Will drug-eluting stents replace coronary artery bypass surgery?

Authors:  Ross M Reul
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

2.  Percutaneous coronary intervention without onsite surgical backup.

Authors:  Gregory J Dehmer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Percutaneous coronary interventions in facilities without cardiac surgery on site.

Authors:  Yuri B Pride; C Michael Gibson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Are cardiac interventions without onsite surgery worth the risk?

Authors:  Y van der Graaf
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.380

5.  Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Indications and Outcomes from 2003 through 2013.

Authors:  Erin M Schumer; John H Chaney; Jaimin R Trivedi; Paul L Linsky; Matthew L Williams; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2016-06-01

6.  Complications of coronary intervention: abrupt closure, dissection, perforation.

Authors:  Debabrata Dash
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2013-05-03

7.  Successful surgical management of coronary perforation requiring pulmonary artery separation.

Authors:  Noriyuki Takashima; Tomoaki Suzuki; Soh Hosoba; Takeshi Kinoshita; Hiromitsu Nota; Keiji Matsubayashi; Tohru Asai
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-05-23

8.  Role of coronary artery bypass grafting during the acute and subacute phase of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Y L Gu; I C C van der Horst; Y L Douglas; T Svilaas; M A Mariani; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Outcomes of a system-wide protocol for elective and nonelective coronary angioplasty at sites without on-site surgery: the Mayo Clinic experience.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Bernard J Gersh; Ryan J Lennon; Henry H Ting; David R Holmes; Brendan J Doyle; Charanjit S Rihal
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Emergency cardiac surgery after a failed percutaneous coronary intervention in an interventional centre without on-site cardiac surgery.

Authors:  J S Lemkes; J O J Peels; R Huybregts; H de Swart; R Hautvast; V A W M Umans
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.