Literature DB >> 16392212

Will drug-eluting stents replace coronary artery bypass surgery?

Ross M Reul1.   

Abstract

Although coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the treatment of choice for certain types of coronary artery disease (CAD), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)--particularly coronary angioplasty with stenting--has become the most popular nonmedical treatment approach to CAD. Some have speculated that, with the advent of drug-eluting stents (DESs), PCI will replace CABG entirely. However, the complete disappearance of CABG is both unlikely and unwarranted, for several reasons. Published randomized trials of CABG, PCI, and medical approaches to CAD compared only highly selected subgroups of patients because of strict exclusion criteria that often favored the PCI cohorts. Therefore, their results do not constitute sufficient evidence for the superiority of PCI over CABG in all CAD patients requiring revascularization. As PCI indications broaden to include more complex lesions and more high-risk patients, outcomes will not remain as favorable. In addition, although PCI is less invasive than surgery, CABG offers more complete revascularization and better freedom from repeat revascularization. Furthermore, no long-term patency data on DESs yet exist, whereas excellent 10- and 20-year patency rates have been reported for the left internal mammary artery-to-left anterior descending artery graft used in most CABG procedures. While PCI has been changing, CABG has not been stagnant; recently, advances in many aspects of the CABG procedure have improved short- and long-term outcomes in CABG patients. Both CABG and PCI technologies will continue to advance, not necessarily exclusive of one another, but no data yet exist to suggest that DESs will render CABG obsolete any time soon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16392212      PMCID: PMC1336702     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  94 in total

1.  The medicine, angioplasty, or surgery study (MASS-II): a randomized, controlled clinical trial of three therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease: one-year results.

Authors:  Whady Hueb; Paulo R Soares; Bernard J Gersh; Luiz A M César; Protásio L Luz; Luiz B Puig; Eulógio M Martinez; Sergio A Oliveira; José A F Ramires
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Health after coronary stenting or balloon angioplasty: results from the Stent Restenosis Study.

Authors:  H M Krumholz; D J Cohen; C Williams; D S Baim; J Brinker; H S Cabin; R Heuser; J Hirshfeld; M B Leon; J Moses; M P Savage; M Cleman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  A randomized trial comparing coronary angioplasty with coronary bypass surgery. Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial (EAST)

Authors:  S B King; N J Lembo; W S Weintraub; A S Kosinski; H X Barnhart; M H Kutner; N P Alazraki; R A Guyton; X Q Zhao
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-10-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Patency of internal thoracic artery grafts: comparison of right versus left and importance of vessel grafted.

Authors:  M S Chow; E Sim; T A Orszulak; H V Schaff
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  The Medicine, Angioplasty or Surgery Study (MASS): a prospective, randomized trial of medical therapy, balloon angioplasty or bypass surgery for single proximal left anterior descending artery stenoses.

Authors:  W A Hueb; G Bellotti; S A de Oliveira; S Arie; C P de Albuquerque; A D Jatene; F Pileggi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Propensity analysis of long-term survival after surgical or percutaneous revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and high-risk features.

Authors:  Sorin J Brener; Bruce W Lytle; Ivan P Casserly; Jakob P Schneider; Eric J Topol; Michael S Lauer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Factors affecting patency of internal thoracic artery graft: clinical and angiographic study in 1434 symptomatic patients operated between 1982 and 2002.

Authors:  Pallav J Shah; Manoj Durairaj; Ian Gordon; John Fuller; Alex Rosalion; Siven Seevanayagam; James Tatoulis; Brian F Buxton
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Is it better to use the radial artery as a composite graft? Clinical and angiographic results of aorto-coronary versus Y-graft.

Authors:  Massimo Lemma; Andrea Mangini; Guido Gelpi; Andrea Innorta; Amedeo Spina; Carlo Antona
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Angiographic 20-year follow-up of 61 consecutive patients with internal thoracic artery grafts.

Authors:  S M Voutilainen; A A Järvinen; K A Verkkala; P E Keto; L O Heikkinen; P E Voutilainen; P T Harjola
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Coronary stenting decreases restenosis in lesions with early loss in luminal diameter 24 hours after successful PTCA.

Authors:  A E Rodriguez; O Santaera; M Larribau; M Fernandez; R Sarmiento; J B Newell; G S Roubin; I F Palacios
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Will stent revascularization replace coronary artery bypass grafting?

Authors:  James M Wilson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

2.  'Miracle stents'--a future without restenosis.

Authors:  Huda Hamid; John Coltart
Journal:  Mcgill J Med       Date:  2007-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.