Literature DB >> 18715538

Percutaneous coronary intervention without onsite surgical backup.

Gregory J Dehmer1.   

Abstract

Although accepted in several countries abroad, the performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without onsite surgical backup is controversial in the United States. Current guidelines from the United States do not endorse elective PCI in facilities without onsite surgical backup but acknowledge that primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is acceptable under carefully regulated and monitored circumstances. This differs from guidelines developed by organizations in other countries. In the United States, data indicate that primary alone or primary and elective PCI without onsite surgery is currently being performed in all but seven states, and the number of patients treated in this setting is increasing. More than 40 articles reporting the outcomes and safety of PCI without onsite surgical backup have been published, but these are from a limited number of centers and are retrospective reviews or prospective registries, which have inherent limitations. Additional studies are currently under way to evaluate PCI's safety and effectiveness in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18715538     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-008-0064-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  45 in total

Review 1.  31st Bethesda Conference. Emergency Cardiac Care. Task force 2: Acute coronary syndromes: Section 2A--Prehospital issues.

Authors:  A M Hutter; W D Weaver
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era.

Authors:  Niranjan Seshadri; Patrick L Whitlow; Naveen Acharya; Penny Houghtaling; Eugene H Blackstone; Stephen G Ellis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Rapid triage and transport of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction for percutaneous coronary intervention in a rural health system.

Authors:  James C Blankenship; Thomas A Haldis; G Craig Wood; Kimberly A Skelding; Thomas Scott; Francis J Menapace
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  A campaign to improve the timeliness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Door-to-Balloon: An Alliance for Quality.

Authors:  Harlan M Krumholz; Elizabeth H Bradley; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Henry H Ting; Wayne B Batchelor; Eva Kline-Rogers; Amy F Stern; Jason R Byrd; John E Brush
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.195

5.  [The performance of coronary angioplasties at centers without cardiac surgery. The recommendations of the Sociedad Española de Cardiología].

Authors:  E Esplugas Oliveras; R A Hernández Antolín; L López Bescós; J Moreu Burgos; J L Pomar Moya-Prats
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.753

6.  Times to treatment in transfer patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI)-3/4 analysis.

Authors:  Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Eric R Bates; Jeph Herrin; Yongfei Wang; Elizabeth H Bradley; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Relationship between time of day, day of week, timeliness of reperfusion, and in-hospital mortality for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  David J Magid; Yongfei Wang; Jeph Herrin; Robert L McNamara; Elizabeth H Bradley; Jeptha P Curtis; Charles V Pollack; William J French; Martha E Blaney; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.

Authors:  Ellen C Keeley; Judith A Boura; Cindy L Grines
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Primary percutaneous coronary intervention expansion to hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery in Michigan: a geographic information systems analysis.

Authors:  Jeremy W Buckley; Eric R Bates; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Sigmund Silber; Per Albertsson; Francisco F Avilés; Paolo G Camici; Antonio Colombo; Christian Hamm; Erik Jørgensen; Jean Marco; Jan-Erik Nordrehaug; Witold Ruzyllo; Philip Urban; Gregg W Stone; William Wijns
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.