Literature DB >> 19483166

Outcomes of a system-wide protocol for elective and nonelective coronary angioplasty at sites without on-site surgery: the Mayo Clinic experience.

Mandeep Singh1, Bernard J Gersh, Ryan J Lennon, Henry H Ting, David R Holmes, Brendan J Doyle, Charanjit S Rihal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) at 2 community hospitals without on-site surgery (Franciscan Skemp Healthcare and Immanuel St. Joseph's Hospital) with a center with on-site surgery (Saint Marys Hospital). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a matched case-control design, we studied 1842 elective and 667 nonelective PCI procedures (myocardial infarction [MI]/cardiogenic shock) performed from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2007. The quality assurance protocol included operator volume and training, application of a risk-adjustment model, transport protocol, and database participation. We compared in-hospital mortality and/or emergent coronary artery bypass surgery after PCI at Franciscan Skemp Healthcare and Immanuel St. Joseph's Hospital, which do not have on-site surgery, with Saint Marys Hospital, a medical center with the capability to perform coronary artery bypass grafting on site.
RESULTS: Of 22 baseline variables, significant imbalances between matched groups were present in only 3 (hyperlipidemia, history of MI, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association B2/C type lesion) in the elective group and 2 (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III/IV angina, multivessel disease) in the nonelective group. The primary end point occurred in 0.3%, 0.1%, and 0.6% of patients undergoing elective PCI (P=.07) and 3.3%, 3.3%, and 3.7% of patients undergoing nonelective PCI (P=.65) at Immanuel St. Joseph's Hospital, Franciscan Skemp Healthcare, and Saint Marys Hospital, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate at Immanuel St. Joseph's Hospital and Franciscan Skemp Healthcare was comparable to that at Saint Marys Hospital for both elective (0.3%, 0.1%, 0.4%; P=.24) and nonelective PCI (2.6%, 2.4%, 3.1%; P=.49). No patient undergoing elective PCI required transfer for emergency cardiac surgery. Of the 21 transfers, 20 (95%) were in the setting of MI and cardiogenic shock or left main/3-vessel disease; 18 patients (86%) survived to discharge.
CONCLUSION: Optimal outcomes with PCI have been observed at community hospitals without on-site cardiac surgical programs with application of a prospective, standardized quality assurance protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19483166      PMCID: PMC2688623          DOI: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60581-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  24 in total

1.  ACC/AHA guidelines of percutaneous coronary interventions (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty).

Authors:  S C Smith; J T Dove; A K Jacobs; J W Kennedy; D Kereiakes; M J Kern; R E Kuntz; J J Popma; H V Schaff; D O Williams; R J Gibbons; J P Alpert; K A Eagle; D P Faxon; V Fuster; T J Gardner; G Gregoratos; R O Russell; S C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  The relationship between operator volume and outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions in high volume hospitals in 1994-1996: the northern New England experience. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group.

Authors:  D J Malenka; P D McGrath; D E Wennberg; T J Ryan; M A Kellett; S J Shubrooks; W A Bradley; B D Hettlemen; J F Robb; M J Hearne; T M Silver; M W Watkins; J R O'Meara; P N VerLee; D J O'Rourke
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era.

Authors:  Niranjan Seshadri; Patrick L Whitlow; Naveen Acharya; Penny Houghtaling; Eugene H Blackstone; Stephen G Ellis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Correlates of procedural complications and a simple integer risk score for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Ryan J Lennon; David R Holmes; Malcolm R Bell; Charanjit S Rihal
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Long-term mortality benefit with abciximab in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  K M Anderson; R M Califf; G W Stone; F J Neumann; G Montalescot; D P Miller; J J Ferguson; J T Willerson; H F Weisman; E J Topol
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Low-risk percutaneous coronary interventions without on-site cardiac surgery: two years' observational experience and follow-up.

Authors:  Henry H Ting; Kirk N Garratt; Mandeep Singh; Michael A Kjelsberg; Farris K Timimi; Kevin T Cragun; Robert J Houlihan; Katherine L Boutchee; Christopher H Crocker; Jack T Cusma; Douglas L Wood; David R Holmes
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction at hospitals with no surgery on-site (the PAMI-No SOS study) versus transfer to surgical centers for primary angioplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Wharton; Lorelei L Grines; Mark A Turco; James D Johnston; Jane Souther; David C Lew; Ajazuddin Z Shaikh; William Bilnoski; Sushil K Singhi; A Ersin Atay; Nancy Sinclair; Dawn E Shaddinger; Mark Barsamian; Mariann Graham; Judith Boura; Cindy L Grines
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Impact of delays to cardiac surgery after failed angioplasty and stenting.

Authors:  Mat Lotfi; Karen Mackie; Vladimir Dzavik; Peter H Seidelin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgical capability.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Henry H Ting; Bernard J Gersh; Peter B Berger; Ryan J Lennon; David R Holmes; Kirk N Garratt
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Bedside estimation of risk from percutaneous coronary intervention: the new Mayo Clinic risk scores.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Charanjit S Rihal; Ryan J Lennon; John Spertus; John S Rumsfeld; David R Holmes
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.616

View more
  2 in total

1.  Fibrinolysis vs. primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Dhiran Verghese; Malcolm R Bell; Dennis H Murphree; Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Paul Elliott Miller; Shannon M Dunlay; Abhiram Prasad; Gurpreet S Sandhu; Rajiv Gulati; Mandeep Singh; Amir Lerman; Bernard J Gersh; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-03-11

2.  Effect of Using a Cardiac Catheterization Table-Stabilizing Stick on the Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Simulation-Based Study.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Yamada; Morihiro Ito; Hisako Urai; Yumiko Ueda; Hiroaki Maki; Reizo Baba
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.