Literature DB >> 29507148

The Encoding of Sound Source Elevation in the Human Auditory Cortex.

Régis Trapeau1,2, Marc Schönwiesner3,2,4,5.   

Abstract

Spatial hearing is a crucial capacity of the auditory system. While the encoding of horizontal sound direction has been extensively studied, very little is known about the representation of vertical sound direction in the auditory cortex. Using high-resolution fMRI, we measured voxelwise sound elevation tuning curves in human auditory cortex and show that sound elevation is represented by broad tuning functions preferring lower elevations as well as secondary narrow tuning functions preferring individual elevation directions. We changed the ear shape of participants (male and female) with silicone molds for several days. This manipulation reduced or abolished the ability to discriminate sound elevation and flattened cortical tuning curves. Tuning curves recovered their original shape as participants adapted to the modified ears and regained elevation perception over time. These findings suggest that the elevation tuning observed in low-level auditory cortex did not arise from the physical features of the stimuli but is contingent on experience with spectral cues and covaries with the change in perception. One explanation for this observation may be that the tuning in low-level auditory cortex underlies the subjective perception of sound elevation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study addresses two fundamental questions about the brain representation of sensory stimuli: how the vertical spatial axis of auditory space is represented in the auditory cortex and whether low-level sensory cortex represents physical stimulus features or subjective perceptual attributes. Using high-resolution fMRI, we show that vertical sound direction is represented by broad tuning functions preferring lower elevations as well as secondary narrow tuning functions preferring individual elevation directions. In addition, we demonstrate that the shape of these tuning functions is contingent on experience with spectral cues and covaries with the change in perception, which may indicate that the tuning functions in low-level auditory cortex underlie the perceived elevation of a sound source.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/383252-13$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory cortex; fMRI; plasticity; sound elevation; spatial hearing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29507148      PMCID: PMC6596065          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2530-17.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  77 in total

1.  Individual differences in external-ear transfer functions reduced by scaling in frequency.

Authors:  J C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Corticofugal modulation of the midbrain frequency map in the bat auditory system.

Authors:  W Yan; N Suga
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Contribution of spectral cues to human sound localization.

Authors:  Erno H A Langendijk; Adelbert W Bronkhorst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Speech segregation based on sound localization.

Authors:  Nicoleta Roman; DeLiang Wang; Guy J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Processing of auditory location changes after horizontal head rotation.

Authors:  Christian F Altmann; Esther Wilczek; Jochen Kaiser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  How and when the fMRI BOLD signal relates to underlying neural activity: the danger in dissociation.

Authors:  Arne Ekstrom
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2009-12-21

7.  Coupling between neuronal firing, field potentials, and FMRI in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Roy Mukamel; Hagar Gelbard; Amos Arieli; Uri Hasson; Itzhak Fried; Rafael Malach
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Dynamic sound localization during rapid eye-head gaze shifts.

Authors:  Joyce Vliegen; Tom J Van Grootel; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Role of auditory cortex in sound localization in the midsagittal plane.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Fernando R Nodal; Carl H Parsons; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  A population rate code of auditory space in the human cortex.

Authors:  Nelli H Salminen; Patrick J C May; Paavo Alku; Hannu Tiitinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Age and Auditory Spatial Perception in Humans: Review of Behavioral Findings and Suggestions for Future Research.

Authors:  Michael Keith Russell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-16

2.  Masking effects on subjective annoyance to aircraft flyover noise: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Nishuai Yu; Jun Cai; Xuanyue Xu; Yining Yang; Junfeng Sun
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Recent advances in understanding the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Andrew J King; Sundeep Teki; Ben D B Willmore
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-09-26

4.  Fronto-Temporal Coupling Dynamics During Spontaneous Activity and Auditory Processing in the Bat Carollia perspicillata.

Authors:  Francisco García-Rosales; Luciana López-Jury; Eugenia González-Palomares; Yuranny Cabral-Calderín; Julio C Hechavarría
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.