Literature DB >> 12394436

Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial.

José Manuel Correa-Rovelo1, Oscar Tellez, Leoncio Obregón, Adriana Miranda-Gomez, Segundo Moran.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We compared the safety and clinical outcome between stapled rectal mucosectomy and closed hemorrhoidectomy for the surgical treatment of noncomplicated hemorrhoidal disease.
METHODS: Eighty-four patients with Grade III and IV hemorrhoidal disease were randomly assigned to two groups: 1) stapled rectal mucosectomy group (n = 42) and 2) closed hemorrhoidectomy group (n = 42). Postoperative pain, analgesic use, symptoms, disability, early and late complications, and patient satisfaction were evaluated, among others. Follow-up was six months.
RESULTS: Eighty-four patients, averaging 45 +/- 9 years of age, underwent surgery. Two were lost to follow-up. Length of surgery and disability, postoperative pain, and use of analgesics were significantly less for patients in the stapled rectal mucosectomy group. In the closed hemorrhoidectomy group early complications were more frequent but not statistically significant, and there were no statistically significant differences regarding the frequency of late complications. No serious complications were reported in either group. Closed hemorrhoidectomy proved to be superior for bleeding control (95.1 percent closed hemorrhoidectomy 80.5 percent stapled rectal mucosectomy; P= 0.04). Patient satisfaction was similar in the two groups, but stapled rectal mucosectomy patients were more willing to undergo the same procedure (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Both stapled rectal mucosectomy and closed hemorrhoidectomy are safe procedures. Closed hemorrhoidectomy was superior for bleeding control in Grade III and IV hemorrhoidal disease, but more painful and disabling than stapled rectal mucosectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12394436     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6426-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  25 in total

1.  Rectal stenosis after procedures for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH)--a report from China.

Authors:  Liqin Yao; Yunshi Zhong; Jianmin Xu; Meidong Xu; Pinghong Zhou
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Hector Ortiz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The use of CEEA 34 in stapled hemorrhoidectomy: suggested modifications in technique.

Authors:  M H Chew; W S Tan; K W Eu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Laughlan; D G Jayne; D Jackson; F Rupprecht; G Ribaric
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Pei-Jing Cui; Hua-Zhong Han; Da-Nian Tong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Residual skin tags following procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: differentiation from recurrence.

Authors:  Xian Hua Gao; Chuan Gang Fu; Paul Fallah-Wandalachi Nabieu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Complications, recurrences, early and late reoperations after stapled haemorrhoidopexy: lessons learned from 1,233 cases.

Authors:  Johannes Jongen; Anne Eberstein; Jens-Uwe Bock; Hans-Günter Peleikis; Volker Kahlke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Tailored prolapse surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoids and obstructed defecation syndrome with a new dedicated device: TST STARR Plus.

Authors:  Gabriele Naldini; Jacopo Martellucci; Roberto Rea; Stefano Lucchini; Michele Schiano di Visconte; Angelo Caviglia; Claudia Menconi; Donglin Ren; Ping He; Domenico Mascagni
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: the argument for usage.

Authors:  Marc Singer; Herand Abcarian
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-05

Review 10.  Stapled versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: is there any evidence-based information?

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Georgia Dedemadi; Arnold Radtke; Ioannis Papanikolaou; Thalis Christofides; Andreas D Rink; Constantine Karaliotas; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.