Literature DB >> 18224481

The use of CEEA 34 in stapled hemorrhoidectomy: suggested modifications in technique.

M H Chew1, W S Tan, K W Eu.   

Abstract

Stapled hemorrhoidectomy has been shown to be superior to conventional hemorrhoidectomy in numerous randomized, controlled trials and systemic reviews, with less postoperative pain and faster recovery. Premium Plus CEEA 34 has been recently introduced for use in stapled hemorrhoidectomy. The use of this stapler requires some modifications in technique.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18224481     DOI： 10.1007/s00268-007-9403-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN： 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  8 in total

1.  Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations.

Authors:  K-H Ng; K-S Ho; B-S Ooi; C-L Tang; K-W Eu
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Rowsell; M Bello; D M Hemingway
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  B J Mehigan; J R Monson; J E Hartley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Hemorrhoidopexy staple line height predicts return to work.

Authors:  Margaret D Plocek; Laurie Ann Kondylis; Nadine Duhan-Floyd; John C Reilly; Daniel P Geisler; Philip D Kondylis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  R Shalaby; A Desoky
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy).

Authors:  Joe J Tjandra; Miranda K Y Chan
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  PPH03 stapled hemorrhoidopexy: our experience.

Authors:  Y K Lim; K W Eu; K S Ho; B S Ooi; C L Tang
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial.

Authors:  José Manuel Correa-Rovelo; Oscar Tellez; Leoncio Obregón; Adriana Miranda-Gomez; Segundo Moran
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.585
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  The use of CEEA 34 in stapled hemorrhoidectomy: suggested modifications in technique.

Authors:  Giuseppe Piccinni
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Short-term results of DST EEA 33 stapler and neu@ anoscope for stapled haemorrhoidectomy: a prospective study of 1,118 patients from a single centre.

Authors:  Ming Hian Kam; Jit Fong Lim; Kok Sun Ho; Boon Swee Ooi; Kong Weng Eu
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Maciej Michalik; Maciej Pawlak; Maciej Bobowicz; Mieczysław Witzling
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.195
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.