Literature DB >> 19639336

Complications, recurrences, early and late reoperations after stapled haemorrhoidopexy: lessons learned from 1,233 cases.

Johannes Jongen1, Anne Eberstein, Jens-Uwe Bock, Hans-Günter Peleikis, Volker Kahlke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to analyse the outcomes of all patients requiring a reoperation after an initial circular stapled haemorrhoidopexy (SH) for prolapsing haemorrhoids.
METHODS: Data of all patients undergoing a circular SH from 1998 thru 2007 available in a prospectively collected database were reviewed, and all patients who had reoperations were studied.
RESULTS: During the study period, 1,233 patients (551 females, median age 52 years) underwent a circular SH. Complete follow-up was available in all patients (median follow-up 7 months, range 0.5-100); 127 patients (10.3%) required one or more reoperations. Early reoperations (<30 days) were necessary in 47 patients (3.8%), and 45 (3.6%) were stapler-related complications. Late reoperations (>30 days) were performed in 84 patients (6.8%) and 57 (4.6%) were stapler-related. A learning curve was observed with significant reduction of early (<30 days) and late (>30 days) reoperation rate with time.
CONCLUSIONS: Reoperations after SH are necessary in about 10% of the patients. The majority of the reoperations are due to either complications arising from circular SH, recurrent/persistent haemorrhoidal symptoms or other anorectal issues not addressed by the circular SH procedure (3.8% early; 6.8% late). Circular SH appears to be an effective procedure for symptomatic haemorrhoidal disease; however, training and learning curve issues should be addressed to minimise treatment failures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19639336     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-009-0543-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  43 in total

Review 1.  The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials.

Authors:  Ping Lan; Xjiaojian Wu; Xuyu Zhou; Jianping Wang; Longjuan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Excision of residual skin tags during stapled anopexy does not increase postoperative pain.

Authors:  R Gerjy; P O Nyström
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Meta-analysis results need to be evaluated with caution.

Authors:  Sven Petersen; Johannes Jongen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Complications and reoperations in stapled anopexy: learning by doing.

Authors:  Johannes Jongen; Jens-Uwe Bock; Hans-Günter Peleikis; Anne Eberstein; Karin Pfister
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. diathermy excision for fourth-degree hemorrhoids: a randomized, clinical trial and review of the literature.

Authors:  Héctor Ortiz; José Marzo; Pedro Armendáriz; Mario De Miguel
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M J Cheetham; N J Mortensen; P O Nystrom; M A Kamm; R K Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsed haemorrhoids: short- and long-term experience.

Authors:  Davide Lomanto; Avinash N Katara
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.767

8.  Primary and repeated stapled hemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing hemorrhoids: follow-up to five years.

Authors:  Dennis Raahave; Lars V Jepsen; Ib K Pedersen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Prospective randomized trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  K S Ho; Y H Ho
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Early experience with stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Marc A Singer; José R Cintron; James W Fleshman; Vivek Chaudhry; Elisa H Birnbaum; Thomas E Read; James S Spitz; Herand Abcarian
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ethical issues on newer technology in colorectal practice.

Authors:  Pravin J Gupta
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Survey of patient satisfaction after Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization performed in ambulatory settings.

Authors:  M B Tempel; E G Pearson; M Page; D Pollock; K Gilmore-Lynch; W Peche; B Sklow; M Snyder
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Six years after: complications and long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy with different devices.

Authors:  Volker Kahlke; Jens Uwe Bock; Hans Günter Peleikis; Johannes Jongen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Agraffectomy after low rectal stapling procedures for hemorrhoids and rectocele.

Authors:  S Petersen; J Jongen; W Schwenk
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy: functional results, recurrence rate, and prognostic factors in a single center analysis.

Authors:  Arndt Voigtsberger; Lucia Popovicova; Gunter Bauer; Knut Werner; Tina Weitschat-Benser; Sven Petersen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  DG-RAR for the treatment of symptomatic grade III and grade IV haemorrhoids: a 12-month multi-centre, prospective observational study.

Authors:  S Roka; D Gold; P Walega; S Lancee; E Zagriadsky; A Testa; A N Kukreja; A Salat
Journal:  Eur Surg       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 0.953

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.