Literature DB >> 18560843

Stapled versus Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: is there any evidence-based information?

George Sgourakis1, Georgios C Sotiropoulos, Georgia Dedemadi, Arnold Radtke, Ioannis Papanikolaou, Thalis Christofides, Andreas D Rink, Constantine Karaliotas, Hauke Lang.   

Abstract

AIMS: The objective of this study was to compare the perioperative, short-term, and long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidectomy with Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present meta-analysis pooled the effects of outcomes of a total 926 patients treated with stapled or Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy in five out of 122 screened for retrieval randomized controlled trials using the fixed-effects or a random-effects model.
RESULTS: Stapled hemorroidectomy was equivalent to the Ferguson procedure in comparisons pertaining to the following outcomes: hospital stay, postoperative hemorrhage requiring intervention, early postoperative bleeding <4 weeks, late postoperative bleeding <8 weeks, and the presence of anal pathology at 1 year follow-up. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy was superior with impact to operative time, pain visual analogue scale score at 24 h, urinary retention, and wound healing.
CONCLUSIONS: There is convincingly apparent evidence about the safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the comparison with the well-established Ferguson procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18560843     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-008-0502-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  21 in total

Review 1.  The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials.

Authors:  Ping Lan; Xjiaojian Wu; Xuyu Zhou; Jianping Wang; Longjuan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Improvement of wound healing after hemorrhoidectomy: a double-blind, randomized study of botulinum toxin injection.

Authors:  Rosalia Patti; Piero L Almasio; Vito M R Muggeo; Salvatore Buscemi; Matteo Arcara; Saverio Matranga; Gaetano Di Vita
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Postoperative urinary retention after surgery for benign anorectal disease: potential risk factors and strategy for prevention.

Authors:  Takayuki Toyonaga; Makoto Matsushima; Nobuhito Sogawa; Song Feng Jiang; Naomi Matsumura; Yasuhiro Shimojima; Yoshiaki Tanaka; Kazunori Suzuki; Junnichi Masuda; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?

Authors:  D Moher; B Pham; A Jones; D J Cook; A R Jadad; M Moher; P Tugwell; T P Klassen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-22       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Franc H Hetzer; Nicolas Demartines; Alexander E Handschin; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-03

6.  Etiology of acute urinary retention following benign anorectal surgery.

Authors:  J G Barone; K B Cummings
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results.

Authors:  A J Senagore; M Singer; H Abcarian; J Fleshman; M Corman; S Wexner; S Nivatvongs
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Prospective randomized trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  K S Ho; Y H Ho
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is associated with a higher long-term recurrence rate of internal hemorrhoids compared with conventional excisional hemorrhoid surgery.

Authors:  Shiva Jayaraman; Patrick H D Colquhoun; Richard A Malthaner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Randomized comparison between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids in Taiwan: a prospective study.

Authors:  Wen-Shih Huang; Chih-Chien Chin; Chong-Hung Yeh; Paul Y Lin; Jeng-Yi Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  2 in total

1.  Stapled hemorrhoidectomy; results of a prospective clinical trial in saudi arabia.

Authors:  Salman Yousuf Guraya; Gamal A Khairy
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-09-10

2.  Comparison of a Hemorrhoidectomy With Ultrasonic Scalpel Versus a Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Dae Ro Lim; Dae Hyun Cho; Joo Hyun Lee; Jae Hwan Moon
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2016-06-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.