Measuring physical performance via self-report in healthy young adults.

Discrepancies exist in literature as to what extent self-reporting can replace performance-based testing. To answer this question, self-reports and performance tests should measure identical constructs. Previous studies did not measure identical constructs. The objective of our study was to investigate to what extent self-reporting can replace performance-based testing. Seventy-two healthy subjects were tested. The constructs of the self-reports and the performance tests covered the same components to enable a comparison of self-reports and performance test results. Three different self-reports and a performance test were used to measure physical performance. Additionally, rating of perceived exertion was measured after the subjects lifted a reference weight to predict maximal lifting performance. The controls were age, gender, educational level, subject's participation in fitness, availability of reference data, motivation, attitude, general self-efficacy, and mood. Results showed that all lifting tasks could be predicted, though not solely via self-reporting. A prediction of the performance test results with a margin of +/-5 kg of error could be made for at least 79% of the subjects, via gender, self-reporting, and subject's participation in fitness. Self-reporting may not replace performance testing, although performance testing can be predicted with a margin of error of +/- 5 kg for at least 79% of the healthy subjects.