Literature DB >> 12441429

Reliability of independent observer judgments of level of lift effort in a kinesiophysical Functional Capacity Evaluation.

S.J. Isernhagen, D.L. Hart, L.M. Matheson.   

Abstract

Functional Capacity Evaluation includes manual materials handling as a primary component. Return to work decisions are often made or influenced by both the heaviest amount of weight that can be safely lifted and the weight that can be handled repetitiously. Kinesiophysical observational criteria were developed to allow trained judges to categorize lifting in order to identify the category of lift effort. Bothinter rater and intrarater reliability were high. When light or heavy categories were isolated for accuracy there were no errors in judge's ratings.

Year:  1999        PMID: 12441429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Work        ISSN: 1051-9815


  25 in total

Review 1.  Definition and assessment of specific occupational demands concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling based on a systematic literature search.

Authors:  J Bos; P P F M Kuijer; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Upper lifting performance of healthy young adults in functional capacity evaluations: a comparison of two protocols.

Authors:  S IJmker; E H Gerrits; M F Reneman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-12

3.  Relationship between kinesiophobia and performance in a functional capacity evaluation.

Authors:  Michiel F Reneman; Wim Jorritsma; Sjoerd J Dijkstra; Pieter U Dijkstra
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-12

Review 4.  Practical aspects of functional capacity evaluations.

Authors:  Glenn S Pransky; Patrick G Dempsey
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-09

5.  The interrater reliability of a functional capacity evaluation: the physical work performance evaluation.

Authors:  Marie-José Durand; Patrick Loisel; Stéphane Poitras; Richard Mercier; Susan R Stock; Jacques Lemaire
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-06

6.  The concurrent validity of the ERGOS Work Simulator and the Ergo-Kit with respect to maximum lifting capacity.

Authors:  G Rustenburg; P P F M Kuijer; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-06

7.  The assessment of function: How is it measured? A clinical perspective.

Authors:  Michael P Reiman; Robert C Manske
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-05

Review 8.  Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system.

Authors:  Vincent Gouttebarge; Haije Wind; P Paul F M Kuijer; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  The role of back muscle endurance, maximum force, balance and trunk rotation control regarding lifting capacity.

Authors:  Peter Schenk; Andreas Klipstein; Susanne Spillmann; Jesper Strøyer; Thomas Laubli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Symptom increase following a functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: an explorative study of safety.

Authors:  Michiel F Reneman; Wietske Kuijer; Sandra Brouwer; H R Schiphorst Preuper; Johan W Groothoff; Jan H B Geertzen; Pieter U Dijkstra
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.