Helain J Landy1, S Katherine Laughon, Jennifer L Bailit, Michelle A Kominiarek, Victor Hugo Gonzalez-Quintero, Mildred Ramirez, Shoshana Haberman, Judith Hibbard, Isabelle Wilkins, D Ware Branch, Ronald T Burkman, Kimberly Gregory, Matthew K Hoffman, Lee A Learman, Christos Hatjis, Paul C VanVeldhuisen, Uma M Reddy, James Troendle, Liping Sun, Jun Zhang. 1. From the Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Health, Washington, DC; the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Indiana University Clarian Health, Indianapolis, Indiana; University of Miami, Miami, Florida; University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York; University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Intermountain Healthcare and the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Tufts University, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware; Summa Health Systems, Akron City Hospital, Akron, Ohio; and the EMMES Corporation, Rockville, Maryland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize potentially modifiable risk factors for third- or fourth-degree perineal lacerations and cervical lacerations in a contemporary U.S. obstetric practice. METHODS: The Consortium on Safe Labor collected electronic medical records from 19 hospitals within 12 institutions (228,668 deliveries from 2002 to 2008). Information on patient characteristics, prenatal complications, labor and delivery data, and maternal and neonatal outcomes were collected. Only women with successful vaginal deliveries of cephalic singletons at 34 weeks of gestation or later were included; we excluded data from sites lacking information about lacerations at delivery and deliveries complicated by shoulder dystocia; 87,267 and 71,170 women were analyzed for third- or fourth-degree and cervical lacerations, respectively. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to adjust for other factors. RESULTS: Third- or fourth-degree lacerations occurred in 2,516 women (2,223 nulliparous [5.8%], 293 [0.6%] multiparous) and cervical lacerations occurred in 536 women (324 nulliparous [1.1%], 212 multiparous [0.5%]). Risks for third- or fourth-degree lacerations included nulliparity (7.2-fold risk), being Asian or Pacific Islander, increasing birth weight, operative vaginal delivery, episiotomy, and longer second stage of labor. Increasing body mass index was associated with fewer lacerations. Risk factors for cervical lacerations included young maternal age, vacuum vaginal delivery, and oxytocin use among multiparous women, and cerclage regardless of parity. CONCLUSION: Our large cohort of women with severe obstetric lacerations reflects contemporary obstetric practices. Nulliparity and episiotomy use are important risk factors for third- or fourth-degree lacerations. Cerclage increases the risk for cervical lacerations. Many identified risk factors may not be modifiable.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize potentially modifiable risk factors for third- or fourth-degree perineal lacerations and cervical lacerations in a contemporary U.S. obstetric practice. METHODS: The Consortium on Safe Labor collected electronic medical records from 19 hospitals within 12 institutions (228,668 deliveries from 2002 to 2008). Information on patient characteristics, prenatal complications, labor and delivery data, and maternal and neonatal outcomes were collected. Only women with successful vaginal deliveries of cephalic singletons at 34 weeks of gestation or later were included; we excluded data from sites lacking information about lacerations at delivery and deliveries complicated by shoulder dystocia; 87,267 and 71,170 women were analyzed for third- or fourth-degree and cervical lacerations, respectively. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to adjust for other factors. RESULTS: Third- or fourth-degree lacerations occurred in 2,516 women (2,223 nulliparous [5.8%], 293 [0.6%] multiparous) and cervical lacerations occurred in 536 women (324 nulliparous [1.1%], 212 multiparous [0.5%]). Risks for third- or fourth-degree lacerations included nulliparity (7.2-fold risk), being Asian or Pacific Islander, increasing birth weight, operative vaginal delivery, episiotomy, and longer second stage of labor. Increasing body mass index was associated with fewer lacerations. Risk factors for cervical lacerations included young maternal age, vacuum vaginal delivery, and oxytocin use among multiparous women, and cerclage regardless of parity. CONCLUSION: Our large cohort of women with severe obstetric lacerations reflects contemporary obstetric practices. Nulliparity and episiotomy use are important risk factors for third- or fourth-degree lacerations. Cerclage increases the risk for cervical lacerations. Many identified risk factors may not be modifiable.
Authors: Holly E Richter; Cynthia G Brumfield; Suzanne P Cliver; Kathryn L Burgio; Cherry L Neely; R Edward Varner Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Bela Kudish; Sean Blackwell; S Gene Mcneeley; Emmanuel Bujold; Michael Kruger; Susan L Hendrix; Robert Sokol Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Michelle A Kominiarek; Paul Vanveldhuisen; Judith Hibbard; Helain Landy; Shoshana Haberman; Lee Learman; Isabelle Wilkins; Jennifer Bailit; Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Victor Hugo Gonzalez-Quintero; Kimberly Gregory; Christos Hatjis; Matthew Hoffman; Mildred Ramirez; Uma M Reddy; James Troendle; Jun Zhang Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-07-31 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy; S Katherine Laughon; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Helain J Landy; Judith U Hibbard; Shoshana Haberman; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Matthew K Hoffman; Kimberly D Gregory; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Christos G Hatjis; Paul van Veldhuisen Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2010-08-12 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Alexander Rodriguez; Edgar A Arenas; Alba L Osorio; Omar Mendez; John J Zuleta Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2008-01-25 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: T Aigmueller; W Bader; K Beilecke; K Elenskaia; A Frudinger; E Hanzal; H Helmer; H Huemer; M van der Kleyn; D Koelle; S Kropshofer; J Pfeiffer; C Reisenauer; A Tammaa; K Tamussino; W Umek Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Joseph E Brown; Benjamin P Partlow; Alison M Berman; Michael D House; David L Kaplan Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-08-24 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: T Aigmueller; W Umek; K Elenskaia; A Frudinger; J Pfeifer; H Helmer; H Huemer; A Tammaa; M van der Kleyn; K Tamussino; D Koelle Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2012-11-17 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Agatha S Critchfield; Reid Mccabe; Nikolai Klebanov; Lauren Richey; Simona Socrate; Errol R Norwitz; David L Kaplan; Michael House Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 3.060
Authors: Kelly Gallagher; Laura Migliaccio; Rebecca G Rogers; Lawrence Leeman; Elizabeth Hervey; Clifford Qualls Journal: J Midwifery Womens Health Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.388