Literature DB >> 12388027

Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. one-year follow-up.

Jay W W Chan1, Marion H Edwards, George C Woo, Victor C P Woo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether contrast sensitivity measurement, a more sensitive test of visual function than visual acuity, better characterizes visual outcomes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).
SETTING: Hong Kong Laser Eye Centre, Hong Kong, China.
METHODS: Contrast sensitivity was monitored in 41 LASIK patients for 1 year. Seven spatial frequencies (0.3, 0.8, 1.5, 3.4, 6.9, 10.3, and 20.5 cpd) were tested with 15 sequences per spatial frequency, and a staircase technique was used for target presentation.
RESULTS: There was a general depression in the contrast sensitivity function after LASIK; 1.5 cpd and 3.4 cpd were the most affected frequencies. Recovery took at least 6 months. The reduction in contrast sensitivity was greater for higher amounts of myopia.
CONCLUSION: The post-LASIK nonpermanent depression in contrast sensitivity was probably due to optical factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12388027     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01499-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  16 in total

1.  Visual performance after conventional LASIK and wavefront-guided LASIK with iris-registration: results at 1 year.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yue-Hua Zhou; Rui Li; Lei Tian
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on accommodation.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Jing Yuan; Jing Li; Xinyu Li; Yulong Wang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2008-10-10

3.  Effect of higher order aberrations on contrast sensitivity function in myopic eyes.

Authors:  Sepehr Feizi; Farid Karimian
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Effects of higher-order aberrations on contrast sensitivity in normal eyes of a large myopic population.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Zhao; Shi-Ming Li; Jing Lu; Hong-Min Song; Jing Zhang; Yue-Hua Zhou; Ning-Li Wang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Curveball: A tool for rapid measurement of contrast sensitivity based on smooth eye movements.

Authors:  Scott W J Mooney; N Jeremy Hill; Melis S Tuzun; Nazia M Alam; Jason B Carmel; Glen T Prusky
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visual quality after wavefront-guided LASIK for myopia.

Authors:  Hyojin Kim; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Ocular aberrations after wavefront optimized LASIK for myopia.

Authors:  Prema Padmanabhan; Subam S Basuthkar; Roy Joseph
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Computer-based primary visual cortex training for treatment of low myopia and early presbyopia.

Authors:  Daniel Durrie; Peter Shaw McMinn
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

9.  Relationship between corneal aberrations and contrast sensitivity after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Tetsuo Ueda; Yoshiaki Nawa; Kozo Masuda; Hidetoshi Ishibashi; Yoshiaki Hara; Hiroshi Uozato
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.211

10.  The effect of diffuse lamellar keratitis on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity following LASIK.

Authors:  Eui Seok Han; Won Ryang Wee; Jin Hak Lee; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.