Literature DB >> 18846347

Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on accommodation.

Lei Liu1, Jing Yuan, Jing Li, Xinyu Li, Yulong Wang.   

Abstract

The accommodative function before and after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) was observed, and the effect of LASIk on accommodation was investigated. In a prospective clinical trial, 48 myopic patients (96 eyes) subject to bilateral LASIK in Refractive Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (China) from March 2006 to June 2006 were selected and studied. Refractions, accommodative range, amplitude of accommodative response and high frequency component (HFC) of accommodative microfluctuations were measured with NEDIK-730A before and one week and 30 days after operation. Dominant and non-dominant eyes were determined by hole-in-card method. It was found that all of the operative eyes showed an uncorrected visual acuity of 0.8 or better one week postoperatively, and 1.0 or better 30 days postoperatively. Compared with those preoperatively, accommodative range and HFC had no significant difference at first week and 30th day after operation in both dominant eyes and non-dominant eyes (P>0.05), but there was a significant difference in the amplitude of accommodative response/accommodative stimulus ratio (A/S) after operation (P<0.01), and no significant difference was found in accommodation between one week and 30 days postoperation. No ocular dominance's change was noted. There was no significant difference in accommodative function between dominant eyes and non-dominant eyes. It was suggested that LASIK produced no significant effect on accommodation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18846347     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-008-0524-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  10 in total

1.  How good is the match between the plane of the text and the plane of focus during reading?

Authors:  F Schaeffel; S Weiss; J Seidel
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jay W W Chan; Marion H Edwards; George C Woo; Victor C P Woo
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Effects of monocular viewing and eye dominance on spatial attention.

Authors:  Heidi L Roth; Andrea N Lora; Kenneth M Heilman
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Arterial pulse modulates steady-state ocular accommodation.

Authors:  B Winn; J R Pugh; B Gilmartin; H Owens
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.424

5.  Accommodation functions: co-dependency and relationship to refractive error.

Authors:  Peter M Allen; Daniel J O'Leary
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Depth-of-focus of the human eye: theory and clinical implications.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Kenneth J Ciuffreda
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.048

7.  Eleven-year follow-up of laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  George D Kymionis; Nikolaos S Tsiklis; Nikolaos Astyrakakis; Aristofanis I Pallikaris; Sophia I Panagopoulou; Ioannis G Pallikaris
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Characteristics of dynamic accommodation responses: comparison between the dominant and non-dominant eyes.

Authors:  K Ibi
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Corneal sensation after laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  R S Chuck; P A Quiros; A C Perez; P J McDonnell
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Optic neuropathy associated with laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  A G Lee; T Kohnen; R Ebner; J L Bennett; N R Miller; T J Carlow; D D Koch
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.351

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Accommodative changes produced in response to overnight orthokeratology.

Authors:  Gema Felipe-Marquez; María Nombela-Palomo; Isabel Cacho; Amelia Nieto-Bona
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Changes in accommodative function following small-incision lenticule extraction for high myopia.

Authors:  Anders Gyldenkerne; Nicolaj Aagaard; Malene Jakobsen; Carina Toftelund; Jesper Hjortdal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparison of accommodation and accommodative micro-fluctuation after implantable collamer lens and LASIK surgery for myopia.

Authors:  Li Li; Bo Zhang; Zheng Wang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Objective Accommodation Amplitude Measurements Using a New Autorefractometer Device.

Authors:  Kemal Ozulken; Hasan Kiziltoprak
Journal:  Beyoglu Eye J       Date:  2019-12-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.