OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography by multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT). DESIGN: Prospective observational study. PATIENTS: 78 patients who underwent both conventional and MSCT coronary angiography for suspicion of de novo coronary artery disease (n=53) or recurrent coronary artery disease after percutaneous intervention (n=25). SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. METHODS: Intravenously contrast enhanced MSCT coronary angiography was done during a single breath hold, and ECG synchronised images were reconstructed retrospectively. All coronary segments of > or = 2.0 mm without stents were evaluated by two investigators and compared with quantitative coronary angiography. Patients were classified according to the average heart rate (mean (SD)) into three equally sized groups: group 1, 55.8 (4.1) beats/min; group 2, 66.6 (2.8) beats/min; group 3, 81.7 (8.8) beats/min. RESULTS: Image quality was sufficient for analysis in 78% of the coronary segments in patients in group 1, 73% in group 2, and 54% in group 3 (p < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting significant stenoses (> or = 50% lumen reduction) in these assessable segments were: 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84% to 100%) and 96% in group 1; 74% (52% to 89%) and 94% in group 2; and 67% (33% to 90%) and 94% in group 3 (p < 0.05). Accounting for all segments of > or = 2.0 mm, including lesions in non-assessable segments as false negatives, the sensitivity decreased to 82% (28/34 lesions, 95% CI 69% to 91%), 61% (14/23 lesions, 42% to 77%), and 32% (6/19 lesions, 15% to 50%), respectively (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: MSCT allows reliable coronary angiography in patients with low heart rates.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography by multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT). DESIGN: Prospective observational study. PATIENTS: 78 patients who underwent both conventional and MSCT coronary angiography for suspicion of de novo coronary artery disease (n=53) or recurrent coronary artery disease after percutaneous intervention (n=25). SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. METHODS: Intravenously contrast enhanced MSCT coronary angiography was done during a single breath hold, and ECG synchronised images were reconstructed retrospectively. All coronary segments of > or = 2.0 mm without stents were evaluated by two investigators and compared with quantitative coronary angiography. Patients were classified according to the average heart rate (mean (SD)) into three equally sized groups: group 1, 55.8 (4.1) beats/min; group 2, 66.6 (2.8) beats/min; group 3, 81.7 (8.8) beats/min. RESULTS: Image quality was sufficient for analysis in 78% of the coronary segments in patients in group 1, 73% in group 2, and 54% in group 3 (p < 0.01). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting significant stenoses (> or = 50% lumen reduction) in these assessable segments were: 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 84% to 100%) and 96% in group 1; 74% (52% to 89%) and 94% in group 2; and 67% (33% to 90%) and 94% in group 3 (p < 0.05). Accounting for all segments of > or = 2.0 mm, including lesions in non-assessable segments as false negatives, the sensitivity decreased to 82% (28/34 lesions, 95% CI 69% to 91%), 61% (14/23 lesions, 42% to 77%), and 32% (6/19 lesions, 15% to 50%), respectively (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: MSCT allows reliable coronary angiography in patients with low heart rates.
Authors: B Ohnesorge; T Flohr; C Becker; A F Kopp; U J Schoepf; U Baum; A Knez; K Klingenbeck-Regn; M F Reiser Journal: Radiology Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: S Achenbach; S Ulzheimer; U Baum; M Kachelriess; D Ropers; T Giesler; W Bautz; W G Daniel; W A Kalender; W Moshage Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-12-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S Achenbach; T Giesler; D Ropers; S Ulzheimer; H Derlien; C Schulte; E Wenkel; W Moshage; W Bautz; W G Daniel; W A Kalender; U Baum Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-05-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe Journal: Circulation Date: 1975-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S Schroeder; A F Kopp; A Baumbach; C Meisner; A Kuettner; C Georg; B Ohnesorge; C Herdeg; C D Claussen; K R Karsch Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: B J Wintersperger; G Bastarrika; K Nikolaou; C Rist; A Huber; A Knez; M F Reiser; C R Becker; C Vicol Journal: Radiologe Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 0.635
Authors: Maureen M Henneman; Jeroen J Bax; Joanne D Schuijf; Ernst E van der Wall Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2005-12-10 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: J D Schuijf; D Poldermans; L J Shaw; J W Jukema; H J Lamb; A de Roos; W Wijns; E E van der Wall; J J Bax Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Martin H K Hoffmann; Jonathan Lessick; Robert Manzke; Florian T Schmid; Edward Gershin; Daniel T Boll; Shmuel Rispler; Andrik J Aschoff; Michael Grass Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-07-14 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Filippo Cademartiri; Nico R Mollet; Giuseppe Runza; Manuel Belgrano; Patrizia Malagutti; Bob W Meijboom; Massimo Midiri; Pim J de Feyter; Gabriel P Krestin Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2005-08-03 Impact factor: 2.357