Literature DB >> 12368781

Allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over 40 years of age.

David K Kuechle1, Sara E Pearson, William R Beach, Eric L Freeman, David F Pawlowski, Terry L Whipple, Richard B Caspari Dagger, John F Meyers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study goal was to determine the results of allograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients over 40 years old at a minimum of 24 months follow-up (mean, 59.7 months; range, 24 to 110 months). TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective review.
METHODS: The records of 57 consecutive patients (mean age at surgery, 45.0 years; range, 40.2 to 60.8 years) were reviewed retrospectively. Nine patients who had undergone either prior ACL reconstruction, extra-articular reinforcement of the intra-articular procedure, or subsequent upper tibial osteotomy were eliminated. One patient was lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 47 patients (48 knees), 29 (62%) were men, and 18 (38%) were women. Twenty-eight of the 47 study patients (60%) were available for clinical interview consisting of physical examination, radiographs, and functional testing. Twenty-seven of these patients also underwent KT-1000 measurement, and 26 underwent Biodex evaluation. The remaining 19 patients were interviewed by telephone.
RESULTS: At follow-up, Lachman, anterior drawer, and pivot shift tests were 0 or 1 in 27 (96%) of 28 patients. Differences between the index and contralateral legs as measured by KT-1000 at 20 lb of force were 0 to 2 mm in 22 of 27 patients (81%) and 3 to 5.5 mm in 5 patients (19%). None had a side-to-side difference greater than 5.5 mm. Based on the International Knee Documentation Committee activity classification system, 26 (55%) of 47 patients achieved the same or higher grade of activity postoperatively as they had preinjury.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of ACL reconstruction in patients over 40 compare favorably with those observed in younger patients. Age should not be a limiting factor in choosing surgical reconstruction to treat functional instability in the ACL-deficient patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12368781     DOI: 10.1053/jars.2002.36140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  16 in total

1.  Effect of repeated freezing-thawing on the Achilles tendon of rabbits.

Authors:  Lianxu Chen; Yanping Wu; Jiakuo Yu; Zhaode Jiao; Yingfang Ao; Changlong Yu; Jianquan Wang; Guoqing Cui
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Prospective comparison of auto and allograft hamstring tendon constructs for ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Cory M Edgar; Scott Zimmer; Sanjeev Kakar; Hugh Jones; Anthony A Schepsis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over 40 years using hamstring autograft.

Authors:  R M Khan; V Prasad; R Gangone; J C Kinmont
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Effects of freezing on the biomechanical and structural properties of human posterior tibial tendons.

Authors:  Sandro Giannini; Roberto Buda; Francesco Di Caprio; Patrizia Agati; Adriana Bigi; Viviana De Pasquale; Alessandro Ruggeri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Acute ACL reconstruction in patients over 40 years of age.

Authors:  Guido Wierer; Armin Runer; Christian Hoser; Elmar Herbst; Peter Gföller; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Outcomes after ACL reconstruction with focus on older patients: results from The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Haukur Björnsson; Kristian Samuelsson; Jón Karlsson; Magnus Forssblad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The role of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the older patients, 55 years or above.

Authors:  James Edmund Arbuthnot; Rodney B Brink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Ian D Engler; Ehab M Nazzal; Jonathan F Dalton; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Jonathan D Hughes; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Della Villa; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Two to five year results of primary ACL reconstruction using doubled tibialis anterior allograft.

Authors:  Martyn Snow; Gregory Campbell; Jay Adlington; William D Stanish
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Is there significant variation in the material properties of four different allografts implanted for ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  David Penn; Thomas L Willet; Mark Glazebrook; Martyn Snow; William D Stanish
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.