Literature DB >> 19039574

Is there significant variation in the material properties of four different allografts implanted for ACL reconstruction.

David Penn1, Thomas L Willet, Mark Glazebrook, Martyn Snow, William D Stanish.   

Abstract

The aims of our study were to: (1) determine if there are differences in the material properties of tendon obtained from implanted tibialis anterior, achilles, bone-patella- bone and tibialis posterior allografts; (2) determine the variability in material properties between the implanted specimens. A total of 60 specimens were collected from fresh frozen allografts implanted at ACL reconstruction. Specimens collected included 15 tibialis anterior, 15 tibialis posterior, 15 achilles and 15 bone-patella-bone tendons. Each specimen was mounted in a custom made cryogrip. The mounted specimens were loaded onto a MTS Testline servo-hydraulic testing machine in a uni-axial tensile test configuration. Specimens were subjected to a strain rate of 5% per second until the ultimate tensile stress (UTS), failure strain and high strain modulus was calculated for each specimen after being normalized for specimen dimensions. Individual material properties were tested using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey's B test with a P value of <0.05 considered significant. Homogeneity of variance was assessed using the Levene's test. As a result, no significant difference was found between all four grafts with regards to UTS, failure strain or high strain linear modulus. The UTS was plotted against the modulus demonstrating a linear relationship which is typical of soft tissues. Significant variability in the results were observed. In conclusion, there was no significant statistical difference between the material properties of the four tendon allografts tested. But significant variability in results was observed within groups and between groups, which may provide one explanation for the range of results in allograft ACL reconstruction reported in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19039574     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0678-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  34 in total

1.  A study of retrieved allografts used to replace anterior cruciate ligaments.

Authors:  Theodore I Malinin; Richard L Levitt; Christopher Bashore; H Thomas Temple; Walid Mnaymneh
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  A biomechanical analysis of matched bone-patellar tendon-bone and double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts.

Authors:  T W Wilson; M P Zafuta; M Zobitz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Effects of gamma irradiation on the initial mechanical and material properties of goat bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts.

Authors:  M J Gibbons; D L Butler; E S Grood; D I Bylski-Austrow; M S Levy; F R Noyes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 4.  Allograft safety in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Steven B Cohen; Jon K Sekiya
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.182

5.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than 40 years: allograft versus autograft patellar tendon.

Authors:  Gene Barrett; David Stokes; Miranda White
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Effect of habitual exercise on the structural and mechanical properties of human tendon, in vivo, in men and women.

Authors:  E Westh; M Kongsgaard; J Bojsen-Moller; P Aagaard; M Hansen; M Kjaer; S P Magnusson
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 4.221

7.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using cryopreserved allografts.

Authors:  Pier Francesco Indelli; Michael F Dillingham; Gary S Fanton; David J Schurman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Freeze dried anterior cruciate ligament allografts. Preliminary studies in a goat model.

Authors:  D W Jackson; E S Grood; S P Arnoczky; D L Butler; T M Simon
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  The adaptability of tendon to loading differs in men and women.

Authors:  S Peter Magnusson; Mette Hansen; Henning Langberg; Ben Miller; Bjarki Haraldsson; Eva Kjoeller Westh; Satu Koskinen; Per Aagaard; Michael Kjaer
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 10.  A meta-analysis of stability of autografts compared to allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Chadwick Prodromos; Brian Joyce; Kelvin Shi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 4.114

View more
  4 in total

1.  Ankle Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Lateral Ligaments (Ankle Anti-ROLL).

Authors:  Masato Takao; Mark Glazebrook; James Stone; Stéphane Guillo
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-10-23

2.  Novel strategies in tendon and ligament tissue engineering: Advanced biomaterials and regeneration motifs.

Authors:  Catherine K Kuo; Joseph E Marturano; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2010-08-20

3.  Fabrication and properties of acellular porcine anulus fibrosus for tissue engineering in spine surgery.

Authors:  Lien-Chen Wu; Chang-Jung Chiang; Zen-Hao Liu; Yang-Hwei Tsuang; Jui-Sheng Sun; Yi-You Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Categorize the existing clamps used for tensile test of human graft- a systematic review.

Authors:  Denes Farago; Blanka Kozma; Rita Maria Kiss
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.562

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.