Literature DB >> 12361941

The prevalence of lead-based paint hazards in U.S. housing.

David E Jacobs1, Robert P Clickner, Joey Y Zhou, Susan M Viet, David A Marker, John W Rogers, Darryl C Zeldin, Pamela Broene, Warren Friedman.   

Abstract

In this study we estimated the number of housing units in the United States with lead-based paint and lead-based paint hazards. We included measurements of lead in intact and deteriorated paint, interior dust, and bare soil. A nationally representative, random sample of 831 housing units was evaluated in a survey between 1998 and 2000; the units and their occupants did not differ significantly from nationwide characteristics. Results indicate that 38 million housing units had lead-based paint, down from the 1990 estimate of 64 million. Twenty-four million had significant lead-based paint hazards. Of those with hazards, 1.2 million units housed low-income families (< 30,000 US dollars/year) with children under 6 years of age. Although 17% of government-supported, low-income housing had hazards, 35% of all low-income housing had hazards. For households with incomes greater than or equal to 30,000 US dollars/year, 19% had hazards. Fourteen percent of all houses had significantly deteriorated lead-based paint, and 16% and 7%, respectively, had dust lead and soil lead levels above current standards of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The prevalence of lead-based paint and hazards increases with age of housing, but most painted surfaces, even in older housing, do not have lead-based paint. Between 2% and 25% of painted building components were coated with lead-based paint. Housing in the Northeast and Midwest had about twice the prevalence of hazards compared with housing in the South and West. The greatest risk occurs in older units with lead-based paint hazards that either will be or are currently occupied by families with children under 6 years of age and are low-income and/or are undergoing renovation or maintenance that disturbs lead-based paint. This study also confirms projections made in 2000 by the President's Task Force on Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks to Children of the number of houses with lead-based paint hazards. Public- and private-sector resources should be directed to units posing the greatest risk if future lead poisoning is to be prevented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12361941      PMCID: PMC1241046          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.021100599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of the HUD lead hazard control grant program: early overall findings.

Authors:  W Galke; S Clark; J Wilson; D Jacobs; P Succop; S Dixon; B Bornschein; P McLaine; M Chen
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Cognitive deficits associated with blood lead concentrations <10 microg/dL in US children and adolescents.

Authors:  B P Lanphear; K Dietrich; P Auinger; C Cox
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Prevalence of radiographic evidence of paint chip ingestion among children with moderate to severe lead poisoning, St Louis, Missouri, 1989 through 1990.

Authors:  M D McElvaine; E G DeUngria; T D Matté; C G Copley; S Binder
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Childhood exposure to lead in surface dust and soil: a community health problem.

Authors:  M J Duggan; M J Inskip
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  1985

5.  The longer-term effectiveness of residential lead paint abatement.

Authors:  M R Farfel; J J Chisolm; C A Rohde
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Home refinishing, lead paint, and infant blood lead levels.

Authors:  M Rabinowitz; A Leviton; D Bellinger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Low-level lead exposure and children's IQ: a meta-analysis and search for a threshold.

Authors:  J Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  A side-by-side comparison of dust collection methods for sampling lead-contaminated house dust.

Authors:  B P Lanphear; M Emond; D E Jacobs; M Weitzman; M Tanner; N L Winter; B Yakir; S Eberly
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  The contribution of lead-contaminated house dust and residential soil to children's blood lead levels. A pooled analysis of 12 epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  B P Lanphear; T D Matte; J Rogers; R P Clickner; B Dietz; R L Bornschein; P Succop; K R Mahaffey; S Dixon; W Galke; M Rabinowitz; M Farfel; C Rohde; J Schwartz; P Ashley; D E Jacobs
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  First National Survey of Lead and Allergens in Housing: survey design and methods for the allergen and endotoxin components.

Authors:  Patrick J Vojta; Warren Friedman; David A Marker; Robert Clickner; John W Rogers; Susan M Viet; Michael L Muilenberg; Peter S Thorne; Samuel J Arbes; Darryl C Zeldin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  98 in total

1.  Effects of developmental stress and lead (Pb) on corticosterone after chronic and acute stress, brain monoamines, and blood Pb levels in rats.

Authors:  Devon L Graham; Curtis E Grace; Amanda A Braun; Tori L Schaefer; Matthew R Skelton; Peter H Tang; Charles V Vorhees; Michael T Williams
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.457

2.  Mechanisms of lead and manganese neurotoxicity.

Authors:  April P Neal; Tomas R Guilarte
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Environmental conditions in low-income urban housing: clustering and associations with self-reported health.

Authors:  Gary Adamkiewicz; John D Spengler; Amy E Harley; Anne Stoddard; May Yang; Marty Alvarez-Reeves; Glorian Sorensen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Screening housing to prevent lead toxicity in children.

Authors:  Bruce P Lanphear; Richard Hornung; Mona Ho
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Exposure to lead and length of time needed to make homes lead-safe for young children.

Authors:  Kristina M Zierold; Jeff Havlena; Henry Anderson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Childhood lead poisoning: the torturous path from science to policy.

Authors:  David C Bellinger; Andrew M Bellinger
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Reliability of spot test kits for detecting lead in household dust.

Authors:  Katrina Smith Korfmacher; Sherry Dixon
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 8.  Lead and mercury exposures: interpretation and action.

Authors:  Elizabeth Brodkin; Ray Copes; Andre Mattman; James Kennedy; Rakel Kling; Annalee Yassi
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Multiple risk factors for lead poisoning in Hispanic sub-populations: a review.

Authors:  Ray W Brown; Thomas Longoria
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2009-03-28

10.  Lead exposure and educational proficiency: moderate lead exposure and educational proficiency on end-of-grade examinations.

Authors:  Michael S Amato; Colleen F Moore; Sheryl Magzamen; Pamela Imm; Jeffrey A Havlena; Henry A Anderson; Marty S Kanarek
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.