Literature DB >> 1557271

Prevalence of radiographic evidence of paint chip ingestion among children with moderate to severe lead poisoning, St Louis, Missouri, 1989 through 1990.

M D McElvaine1, E G DeUngria, T D Matté, C G Copley, S Binder.   

Abstract

Although experts once believed that ingesting chips of lead-based paint was the major cause of lead poisoning among children, conventional wisdom now holds that lead-contaminated dust and soil are the major routes of exposure. Data from a childhood lead-poisoning treatment clinic were examined to assess the frequency with which children ingest paint chips. For this study, the reports on abdominal radiographs of 90 children with moderate to severe lead poisoning who had received their first chelation treatment during 1989 or 1990 were reviewed. According to a radiologist's evaluation, 13 of 90 abdominal radiographs (14%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 7% to 22%) showed evidence of paint chip ingestion. Of 46 children with blood lead levels greater than or equal to 55 micrograms/dL, 12 (26%) had radiographs that showed paint chips, whereas only 1 (2%) of 44 children with blood lead levels less than 55 micrograms/dL had such radiographs (prevalence ratio = 11.5; 95% CI 1.6 to 84.6). The actual proportion of children with moderate to severe lead poisoning who have consumed leaded-paint chips is likely to be higher than this estimate based on radiographic evidence. While lead-contaminated dust is a major source of lead exposure, ingestion of leaded-paint chips clearly remains an important source of exposure among children with moderate to severe lead poisoning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1557271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  4 in total

1.  Childhood lead poisoning from paint chips: a continuing problem.

Authors:  Mark Su; Fermin Barrueto; Robert S Hoffman
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Reliability of spot test kits for detecting lead in household dust.

Authors:  Katrina Smith Korfmacher; Sherry Dixon
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  The high cost of improper removal of lead-based paint from housing: a case report.

Authors:  David E Jacobs; Howard Mielke; Nancy Pavur
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  The prevalence of lead-based paint hazards in U.S. housing.

Authors:  David E Jacobs; Robert P Clickner; Joey Y Zhou; Susan M Viet; David A Marker; John W Rogers; Darryl C Zeldin; Pamela Broene; Warren Friedman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.