Gary Adamkiewicz1, John D Spengler, Amy E Harley, Anne Stoddard, May Yang, Marty Alvarez-Reeves, Glorian Sorensen. 1. Gary Adamkiewicz and John D. Spengler are with the Department of Environmental Health and Glorian Sorensen is with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA. Amy E. Harley is with the Joseph J. Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee. Anne Stoddard and May Yang are with the New England Research Institutes, Watertown, MA. Marty Alvarez-Reeves is with the Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We explored prevalence and clustering of key environmental conditions in low-income housing and associations with self-reported health. METHODS: The Health in Common Study, conducted between 2005 and 2009, recruited participants (n = 828) from 20 low-income housing developments in the Boston area. We interviewed 1 participant per household and conducted a brief inspection of the unit (apartment). We created binary indexes and a summed index for household exposures: mold, combustion by-products, secondhand smoke, chemicals, pests, and inadequate ventilation. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the associations between each index and household characteristics and between each index and self-reported health. RESULTS: Environmental problems were common; more than half of homes had 3 or more exposure-related problems (median summed index = 3). After adjustment for household-level demographics, we found clustering of problems in site (P < .01) for pests, combustion byproducts, mold, and ventilation. Higher summed index values were associated with higher adjusted odds of reporting fair-poor health (odds ratio = 2.7 for highest category; P < .008 for trend). CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence that indoor environmental conditions in multifamily housing cluster by site and that cumulative exposures may be associated with poor health.
OBJECTIVES: We explored prevalence and clustering of key environmental conditions in low-income housing and associations with self-reported health. METHODS: The Health in Common Study, conducted between 2005 and 2009, recruited participants (n = 828) from 20 low-income housing developments in the Boston area. We interviewed 1 participant per household and conducted a brief inspection of the unit (apartment). We created binary indexes and a summed index for household exposures: mold, combustion by-products, secondhand smoke, chemicals, pests, and inadequate ventilation. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the associations between each index and household characteristics and between each index and self-reported health. RESULTS: Environmental problems were common; more than half of homes had 3 or more exposure-related problems (median summed index = 3). After adjustment for household-level demographics, we found clustering of problems in site (P < .01) for pests, combustion byproducts, mold, and ventilation. Higher summed index values were associated with higher adjusted odds of reporting fair-poor health (odds ratio = 2.7 for highest category; P < .008 for trend). CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence that indoor environmental conditions in multifamily housing cluster by site and that cumulative exposures may be associated with poor health.
Authors: Junenette L Peters; Jonathan I Levy; Christine A Rogers; Harriet A Burge; John D Spengler Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Ginger L Chew; Elizabeth J Carlton; Daniel Kass; Marta Hernandez; Brian Clarke; Julius Tiven; Robin Garfinkel; Sean Nagle; David Evans Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Arnaud Chiolero; Vincent Wietlisbach; Christiane Ruffieux; Fred Paccaud; Jacques Cornuz Journal: Prev Med Date: 2006-02-28 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Asa Bradman; Jonathan Chevrier; Ira Tager; Michael Lipsett; Jaqueline Sedgwick; Janet Macher; Ana B Vargas; Elvia B Cabrera; Jose M Camacho; Rosana Weldon; Katherine Kogut; Nicholas P Jewell; Brenda Eskenazi Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Sonja N Sax; Deborah H Bennett; Steven N Chillrud; James Ross; Patrick L Kinney; John D Spengler Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Felicia Wu; David Jacobs; Clifford Mitchell; David Miller; Meryl H Karol Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2007-01-25 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jane E Clougherty; Jonathan I Levy; Laura D Kubzansky; P Barry Ryan; Shakira Franco Suglia; Marina Jacobson Canner; Rosalind J Wright Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Katie A Ports; Dawn M Holman; Angie S Guinn; Sanjana Pampati; Karen E Dyer; Melissa T Merrick; Natasha Buchanan Lunsford; Marilyn Metzler Journal: J Pediatr Nurs Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 2.145
Authors: Gabriela R Oates; William T Harris; Steven M Rowe; George M Solomon; Suranjana Dey; Aowen Zhu; Wynton C Hoover; Hector H Gutierrez Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Meryl D Colton; Jose Guillermo Cedeno Laurent; Piers MacNaughton; John Kane; Mae Bennett-Fripp; John Spengler; Gary Adamkiewicz Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Gregory D Kearney; Arjun B Chatterjee; Jennifer Talton; Haiying Chen; Sara A Quandt; Phillip Summers; Thomas A Arcury Journal: J Agromedicine Date: 2014 Impact factor: 1.675
Authors: Paul Y Takahashi; Euijung Ryu; Matthew A Hathcock; Janet E Olson; Suzette J Bielinski; James R Cerhan; Jennifer Rand-Weaver; Young J Juhn Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 3.710