PURPOSE: To investigate and quantify the impact of moderate lead exposure on students' ability to score at the "proficient" level on end-of-grade standardized tests. METHODS: We compared the scores of 3757 fourth grade students from Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on the Wisconsin Knowledge and Concepts Exam (WKCE). The sample consisted of children with a blood lead test before age 3 years that was either unquantifiable at the time of testing (<5 μg/dL) or in the range of moderate exposure (10-19 μg/dL). RESULTS: After controlling for gender, poverty, English language learner status, race/ethnicity, school disciplinary actions, and attendance percentage, results showed a significant negative effect of moderate lead exposure on academic achievement for all 5 subtests of the WKCE. Test score deficits owing to lead exposure were equal to 22% of the interval between student categorization at the "proficient" or "basic" levels in Reading, and 42% of the interval in Mathematics. CONCLUSIONS: Children exposed to amounts of lead before age 3 years that are insufficient to trigger intervention under current policies in many states are nonetheless at a considerable educational disadvantage compared with their unexposed peers 7 to 8 years later. Exposed students are at greater risk of scoring below the proficient level, an outcome with serious negative consequences for both the student and the school.
PURPOSE: To investigate and quantify the impact of moderate lead exposure on students' ability to score at the "proficient" level on end-of-grade standardized tests. METHODS: We compared the scores of 3757 fourth grade students from Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on the Wisconsin Knowledge and Concepts Exam (WKCE). The sample consisted of children with a blood lead test before age 3 years that was either unquantifiable at the time of testing (<5 μg/dL) or in the range of moderate exposure (10-19 μg/dL). RESULTS: After controlling for gender, poverty, English language learner status, race/ethnicity, school disciplinary actions, and attendance percentage, results showed a significant negative effect of moderate lead exposure on academic achievement for all 5 subtests of the WKCE. Test score deficits owing to lead exposure were equal to 22% of the interval between student categorization at the "proficient" or "basic" levels in Reading, and 42% of the interval in Mathematics. CONCLUSIONS:Children exposed to amounts of lead before age 3 years that are insufficient to trigger intervention under current policies in many states are nonetheless at a considerable educational disadvantage compared with their unexposed peers 7 to 8 years later. Exposed students are at greater risk of scoring below the proficient level, an outcome with serious negative consequences for both the student and the school.
Authors: Sherry G Selevan; Deborah C Rice; Karen A Hogan; Susan Y Euling; Andrea Pfahles-Hutchens; James Bethel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Aimin Chen; Kim N Dietrich; James H Ware; Jerilynn Radcliffe; Walter J Rogan Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Bruce P Lanphear; Richard Hornung; Jane Khoury; Kimberly Yolton; Peter Baghurst; David C Bellinger; Richard L Canfield; Kim N Dietrich; Robert Bornschein; Tom Greene; Stephen J Rothenberg; Herbert L Needleman; Lourdes Schnaas; Gail Wasserman; Joseph Graziano; Russell Roberts Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: David E Jacobs; Robert P Clickner; Joey Y Zhou; Susan M Viet; David A Marker; John W Rogers; Darryl C Zeldin; Pamela Broene; Warren Friedman Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Michael R Kramer; Eric B Schneider; Jennifer B Kane; Claire Margerison-Zilko; Jessica Jones-Smith; Katherine King; Pamela Davis-Kean; Joseph G Grzywacz Journal: Popul Res Policy Rev Date: 2017-03-28
Authors: Barbara A Lewis; Sonia Minnes; Meeyoung O Min; Elizabeth J Short; Miaoping Wu; Adelaide Lang; Paul Weishampel; Lynn T Singer Journal: J Commun Disord Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 2.288
Authors: Gauri Desai; Gabriel Barg; Marie Vahter; Elena I Queirolo; Fabiana Peregalli; Nelly Mañay; Amy E Millen; Jihnhee Yu; Richard W Browne; Katarzyna Kordas Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2019-10-03 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Anne Evens; Daniel Hryhorczuk; Bruce P Lanphear; Kristin M Rankin; Dan A Lewis; Linda Forst; Deborah Rosenberg Journal: Environ Health Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Michael J Blackowicz; Daniel O Hryhorczuk; Kristin M Rankin; Dan A Lewis; Danish Haider; Bruce P Lanphear; Anne Evens Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Rachel M Shaffer; Samuel P Sellers; Marissa G Baker; Rebeca de Buen Kalman; Joseph Frostad; Megan K Suter; Susan C Anenberg; John Balbus; Niladri Basu; David C Bellinger; Linda Birnbaum; Michael Brauer; Aaron Cohen; Kristie L Ebi; Richard Fuller; Philippe Grandjean; Jeremy J Hess; Manolis Kogevinas; Pushpam Kumar; Philip J Landrigan; Bruce Lanphear; Stephanie J London; Andrew A Rooney; Jeffrey D Stanaway; Leonardo Trasande; Katherine Walker; Howard Hu Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2019-10-18 Impact factor: 9.031