Literature DB >> 12359401

The anatomy of the aortic root.

Denis Berdajs1, Patonay Lajos, Marko Turina.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Since the aortic root preserving methods are spreading in heart surgery, the importance of aortic root anatomy is increasing. The surgical and anatomical descriptions of the aortic root are not always congruent. Therefore, the present study focuses on the surgical aspects of the aortic root anatomy.
METHODS: We measured the distances between the three commissures, the distances between the basal point of the sinus and the sinotubular junction and the heights of the sinuses. The circumference of the sinotubular junction and the annuli fibrosi were also obtained. In addition, the volume of every sinus was directly measured. Finally both vertical and horizontal histological sections of annuli fibrosi were made.
RESULTS: All measured parameters were averaged and the standard deviation (SD) was calculated, except in the case of the tilt angle. The distance for the right sinus commissures was 18.82 mm (SD 1.93 mm), and that of the non- and left coronary sinus were 17.43 (SD 2.06) and 15.21 (SD 1.88) mm, respectively. The mean height of the right, non- and left coronary sinus were 19.45 (SD 1.91), 17.68 (SD 1.77) and 17.45 (SD 1.39) mm, respectively. These differences between the height of the sinuses determines a mean tilt angle of 5.47 degrees for the sinotubular junction and aortic root base. The mean circumference of the aortic root base and of the sinotubular junction was 69.20 (SD 6.93), and 65.82 (SD 8.31) mm, respectively. Mean volumes of the right, non- and left coronary sinuses were 1.6 (SD 0.34), 1.33 (SD 0.27) and 1.04 (SD 0.23l) ml. According to the histological sections we can say that the histological border of the annuli fibrosi is positioned at the interleaflate triangles.
CONCLUSION: According to the measured data we can state that all parameters follow the pattern in which the right sinus structures had the greatest dimensions followed by the non coronary sinus, and finally the left coronary sinus. The tilt angle for aortic root base and sinotubular junction, and the difference in the diameters could be of hemodynamic and of surgical relevance

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12359401     DOI: 10.1016/s0967-2109(02)00018-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0967-2109


  10 in total

1.  Anatomy and pathophysiology of the ventriculo-aortic junction: implication in aortic valve repair surgery.

Authors:  Laurent de Kerchove; Gebrine El Khoury
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

Review 2.  In vivo imaging and computational analysis of the aortic root. Application in clinical research and design of transcatheter aortic valve systems.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Alexander Hill; Tim Kelley; Zoran Popovic; Sandra S Halliburton
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  MDCT differentiation between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in patients with aortic valvular disease: correlation with surgical findings.

Authors:  Ijin Joo; Eun-Ah Park; Kyung-Hwan Kim; Whal Lee; Jin Wook Chung; Jae Hyung Park
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Ex vivo and in vivo coronary ostial locations in humans.

Authors:  Joseph Knight; Vartan Kurtcuoglu; Karl Muffly; William Marshall; Paul Stolzmann; Lotus Desbiolles; Burkhardt Seifert; Dimos Poulikakos; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Aortic valve adaptation to aortic root dilatation: insights into the mechanism of functional aortic regurgitation from 3-dimensional cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Dae-Hee Kim; Mark D Handschumacher; Robert A Levine; Byung Joo Sun; Jeong Yoon Jang; Dong Hyun Yang; Joon-Won Kang; Jong-Min Song; Duk-Hyun Kang; Tae-Hwan Lim; Jae-Kwan Song
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 7.792

6.  Remodelling of the aortic root in severe tricuspid aortic stenosis: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Paul Stolzmann; Joseph Knight; Lotus Desbiolles; Willibald Maier; Hans Scheffel; André Plass; Vartan Kurtcuoglu; Sebastian Leschka; Dimos Poulikakos; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Sinus of Valsalva Aneurysms: A Review with Perioperative Considerations.

Authors:  Mark J Arcario; Sunny Lou; Phillip Taylor; Stephen H Gregory
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Aortic root volume and geometry: ready for clinical application?

Authors:  Jong-Min Song
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2011-09-30

9.  Reply: Repair or replace the aortic root: The eternal unsolved dilemma.

Authors:  Grace Lee; Veronica Chan; Bobby Yanagawa
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-04-23

10.  In vivo assessment of aortic root geometry in normal controls using 3D analysis of computed tomography.

Authors:  Dong Hyun Yang; Dae-Hee Kim; Mark D Handschumacher; Robert A Levine; Joon Bum Kim; Byung Joo Sun; Jeong Yoon Jang; Namkug Kim; Seunghee Baek; Joon-Won Kang; Jong-Min Song; Duk-Hyun Kang; Tae-Hwan Lim; Jae-Kwan Song
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.875

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.