Literature DB >> 12356434

Multisensory attention and tactile information-processing.

Charles Spence1.   

Abstract

Although a great deal is now known about the peripheral sensory mechanisms involved in tactile information processing [Ann Rev Psychol 1990;50:305], it is only more recently that we have started to gain a clearer understanding of the effects of selective attention on tactile perception [Front Biosci 2000;5:D894]. To date, the majority of this selective attention research has considered each modality in isolation. However, in order to deal with the multimodal selection problems of everyday life, we need to be able to coordinate our selective attention cross-modally [Philos Trans R Soc, Sec B 1998:353; Curr Biol 2000;10:R731]. In this review, I will highlight the results of behavioral studies demonstrating the existence of extensive cross-modal links in selective attention between touch, vision, audition, and even olfaction. In particular, the review is structured around two key research questions: First, "Can attention can be selectively directed to a particular sensory modality?", and second "Are there cross-modal links in spatial attention?". The results of recent neuroimaging studies that have started to elucidate some of the neural mechanisms underlying these cross-modal attentional effects are also discussed, and potential questions for future research outlined.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12356434     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00155-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  17 in total

1.  Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Giovanni Galfano; Bruce Bridgeman; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The brain's fingers and hands.

Authors:  Patrick Haggard; Keiko Kitadono; Clare Press; Marisa Taylor-Clarke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Crossmodal influences in somatosensory cortex: Interaction of vision and touch.

Authors:  Jennifer K Dionne; Sean K Meehan; Wynn Legon; W Richard Staines
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The approach of visual stimuli influences expectations about stimulus types for subsequent somatosensory stimuli.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kimura; Jun'ichi Katayama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Haptic-payment: Exploring vibration feedback as a means of reducing overspending in mobile payment.

Authors:  Muhanad Shakir Manshad; Daniel Brannon
Journal:  J Bus Res       Date:  2020-09-11

6.  Altered auditory-tactile interactions in congenitally blind humans: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Kirsten Hötting; Frank Rösler; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Human olfaction: a constant state of change-blindness.

Authors:  Lee Sela; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Response requirements modulate tactile spatial congruency effects.

Authors:  Alberto Gallace; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Polly Dalton; Bas Kreukniet; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Neurobehavioral testing in human risk assessment.

Authors:  Diane S Rohlman; Roberto Lucchini; W Kent Anger; David C Bellinger; Christoph van Thriel
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.294

10.  Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects.

Authors:  Charles Spence; Francesco Pavani; Jon Driver
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.