Literature DB >> 15460922

Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects.

Charles Spence1, Francesco Pavani, Jon Driver.   

Abstract

Across three experiments, participants made speeded elevation discrimination responses to vibrotactile targets presented to the thumb (held in a lower position) or the index finger (upper position) of either hand, while simultaneously trying to ignore visual distractors presented independently from either the same or a different elevation. Performance on the vibrotactile elevation discrimination task was slower and less accurate when the visual distractor was incongruent with the elevation of the vibrotactile target (e.g., a lower light during the presentation of an upper vibrotactile target to the index finger) than when they were congruent, showing that people cannot completely ignore vision when selectively attending to vibrotactile information. We investigated the attentional, temporal, and spatial modulation of these cross-modal congruency effects by manipulating the direction of endogenous tactile spatial attention, the stimulus onset asynchrony between target and distractor, and the spatial separation between the vibrotactile target, any visual distractors, and the participant's two hands within and across hemifields. Our results provide new insights into the spatiotemporal modulation of cross-modal congruency effects and highlight the utility of this paradigm for investigating the contributions of visual, tactile, and proprioceptive inputs to the multisensory representation of peripersonal space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15460922     DOI: 10.3758/cabn.4.2.148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  45 in total

1.  Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans.

Authors:  Angelo Maravita; Charles Spence; Steffan Kennett; Jon Driver
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-03

2.  A generalized role of interhemispheric interaction under attentionally demanding conditions: evidence from the auditory and tactile modality.

Authors:  Alessandra M Passarotti; Marie T Banich; Rajiv K Sood; Jeremy M Wang
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Tactile-visual links in exogenous spatial attention under different postures: convergent evidence from psychophysics and ERPs.

Authors:  S Kennett; M Eimer; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The space around us.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; L Fadiga; L Fogassi; V Gallese
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-07-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space.

Authors:  Elisabetta La'davas
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Hemispheres as independent resource systems: limited-capacity processing and cerebral specialization.

Authors:  A Friedman; M C Polson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; C Scandolara; M Matelli; M Gentilucci
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.

Authors:  F Pavani; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

9.  Cross-modal selective attention: on the difficulty of ignoring sounds at the locus of visual attention.

Authors:  C Spence; J Ranson; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

10.  When mirrors lie: "visual capture" of arm position impairs reaching performance.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes; Gemma Crozier; Charles Spence
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

View more
  73 in total

1.  Vision of a pictorial hand modulates visual-tactile interactions.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Norimichi Kitagawa; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Congruency effects between auditory and tactile motion: extending the phenomenon of cross-modal dynamic capture.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Does tool use extend peripersonal space? A review and re-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Multisensory gain within and across hemispaces in simple and choice reaction time paradigms.

Authors:  Simon Girard; Olivier Collignon; Franco Lepore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Investigating the spatial and temporal modulation of visuotactile interactions in older adults.

Authors:  Samuel Couth; Emma Gowen; Ellen Poliakoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Long-lasting capture of tactile attention by body shadows.

Authors:  Giovanni Galfano; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Influence of visual motion on tactile motion perception.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J H Killebrew; J C Craig
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Effects of visual stimuli on temporal order judgments of unimanual finger stimuli.

Authors:  Satoshi Shibuya; Toshimitsu Takahashi; Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Yota Kimura; Charles Spence; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Remember the touch: tactile distractors retrieve previous responses to targets.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Christian Frings
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.