Literature DB >> 12354989

Renal cyst pseudoenhancement: evaluation with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom.

Bernard A Birnbaum1, Daniel D Maki, Dev P Chakraborty, Jill E Jacobs, James S Babb.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of cyst diameter and location (intrarenal, exophytic), renal attenuation, section collimation, and computed tomographic (CT) interscanner variability on renal cyst pseudoenhancement in a phantom model.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A customized anthropomorphic phantom was designed to accept 40-, 140-, and 240-HU renal inserts containing intrarenal and exophytic 7-, 10-, and 15-mm cysts. Each phantom and insert were scanned with five different helical CT scanners by using 1.0-1.5-mm, 2.50-3.75-mm, 5.0-mm, 7.0-8.0-mm, and 10.0-mm section collimation. Means and SDs of CT number measurements were obtained for each cyst within each variably "enhanced" renal insert. Mixed-model analysis of variance accommodating heteroscedasticity of data was used to assess the effect of scanner type, section collimation, and cyst diameter on cyst attenuation.
RESULTS: Pseudoenhancement (range, 10.3-28.3 HU), observed by using effective section collimation equal to or less than 50% of cyst diameter, occurred in 34 (38%) of 90 intrarenal cyst measurements. Pseudoenhancement was observed with all five CT scanners, though the magnitude of the effect was nonuniform. Significant interactions were noted between renal cyst diameter, background renal attenuation, and CT scanner type in terms of their effects on cyst attenuation. No appreciable pseudoenhancement was observed with exophytic cysts.
CONCLUSION: Pseudoenhancement is maximal when small (< or = 1.5-cm) intrarenal cysts are scanned during maximal levels of renal parenchymal enhancement. The magnitude of this effect varies with scanner type but may be large enough to prevent accurate lesion characterization, despite use of a thin-section helical CT data acquisition technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12354989     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2251010930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  16 in total

1.  Precision of the measurement of CT numbers: comparison of dual-energy CT spectral imaging with fast kVp switching and conventional CT with phantoms.

Authors:  Izuru Matsuda; Masaaki Akahane; Jiro Sato; Masaki Katsura; Shigeru Kiryu; Naoki Yoshioka; Akira Kunimatsu; Kenji Ino; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT and subtraction CT for renal lesion detection and characterization.

Authors:  Ali Pourvaziri; Anushri Parakh; Amirkasra Mojtahed; Avinash Kambadakone; Dushyant Vasudeo Sahani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Renal cyst pseudoenhancement at multidetector CT: what are the effects of number of detectors and peak tube voltage?

Authors:  Zhen J Wang; Fergus V Coakley; Yanjun Fu; Bonnie N Joe; Sven Prevrhal; Luis A Landeras; Emma M Webb; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Dual-energy CT iodine overlay technique for characterization of renal masses as cyst or solid: a phantom feasibility study.

Authors:  C L Brown; R P Hartman; O P Dzyubak; N Takahashi; A Kawashima; C H McCollough; M R Bruesewitz; A M Primak; J G Fletcher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  In vivo predictors of renal cyst pseudoenhancement at 120 kVp.

Authors:  Jeet Patel; Matthew S Davenport; Shokoufeh Khalatbari; Richard H Cohan; James H Ellis; Joel F Platt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Role of percutaneous needle biopsy for renal masses.

Authors:  Elaine M Caoili; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Distinguishing enhancing from nonenhancing renal masses with dual-source dual-energy CT: iodine quantification versus standard enhancement measurements.

Authors:  Giorgio Ascenti; Achille Mileto; Bernhard Krauss; Michele Gaeta; Alfredo Blandino; Emanuele Scribano; Nicola Settineri; Silvio Mazziotti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  MRI of the kidney-state of the art.

Authors:  J J Nikken; G P Krestin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  The characterization of small hypoattenuating renal masses on contrast-enhanced CT.

Authors:  Neesha S Patel; Liina Poder; Zhen J Wang; Benjamin M Yeh; Aliya Qayyum; Hua Jin; Fergus V Coakley
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.605

10.  Quantitative iodine content threshold for discrimination of renal cell carcinomas using rapid kV-switching dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Jessica G Zarzour; Desmin Milner; Roberto Valentin; Bradford E Jackson; Jennifer Gordetsky; Janelle West; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Desiree E Morgan
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.