Literature DB >> 12350270

Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster.

Scott Pitnick1, Francisco García-González.   

Abstract

Previous studies indicate that female Drosophila melanogaster are harmed by their mates through copulation. Here, we demonstrate that the harm that males inflict upon females increases with male size. Specifically, both the lifespan and egg-production rate of females decreased significantly as an increasing function of the body size of their mates. Consequently, females mating with larger males had lower lifetime fitness. The detrimental effect of male size on female longevity was not mediated by male effects on female fecundity, egg-production rate or female-remating behaviour. Similarly, the influence of male size on female lifetime fecundity was independent of the male-size effect on female longevity. There was no relationship between female size and female resistance to male harm. Thus, although increasing male body size is known to enhance male mating success, it has a detrimental effect on the direct fitness of their mates. Our results indicate that this harm is a pleiotropic effect of some other selected function and not an adaptation. To the extent that females prefer to mate with larger males, this choice is harmful, a pattern that is consistent with the theory of sexually antagonistic coevolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12350270      PMCID: PMC1691094          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  30 in total

1.  Evolution of female remating behaviour following experimental removal of sexual selection.

Authors:  S Pitnick; W D Brown; G T Miller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The Drosophila seminal fluid protein Acp26Aa stimulates release of oocytes by the ovary.

Authors:  Y Heifetz; O Lung; E A Frongillo; M F Wolfner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-01-27       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes.

Authors:  David Houle; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Male genotype affects female longevity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R Sawby; K A Hughes
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Sexually antagonistic coevolution in a mating system: combining experimental and comparative approaches to address evolutionary processes.

Authors:  Locke Rowe; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  The Drosophila melanogaster seminal fluid protein Acp62F is a protease inhibitor that is toxic upon ectopic expression.

Authors:  Oliver Lung; Uyen Tram; Casey M Finnerty; Marcie A Eipper-Mains; John M Kalb; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Males' evolutionary responses to experimental removal of sexual selection.

Authors:  S Pitnick; G T Miller; J Reagan; B Holland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Sexual and reproductive behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster from a microclimatically interslope differentiated population of "Evolution Canyon" (Mount Carmel, Israel).

Authors:  K Iliadi; N Iliadi; E Rashkovetsky; I Minkov; E Nevo; A Korol
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  STUDIES ON NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA. IV. GENETIC VARIANCES OF AND CORRELATIONS BETWEEN FOUR CHARACTERS IN D. MELANOGASTER AND D. SIMULANS.

Authors:  A O TANTAWY; F A RAKHA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  52 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of mate choice and mating biases.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Robert Brooks; Michael D Jennions; Josephine Morley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Mating with large males decreases the immune defence of females in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K Imroze; N G Prasad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Diversity-enhancing selection acts on a female reproductive protease family in four subspecies of Drosophila mojavensis.

Authors:  Erin S Kelleher; Nathaniel L Clark; Therese A Markow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Do female Drosophila melanogaster adaptively bias offspring sex ratios in relation to the age of their mate?

Authors:  Tristan A F Long; Alison Pischedda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Strong association between a single gene and fertilization efficiency of males and fecundity of their mates in the bulb mite.

Authors:  Magdalena Konior; Jacek Radwan; Maria Kołodziejczyk; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sexual conflict and reproductive isolation in flies.

Authors:  D J Hosken; O Y Martin; S Wigby; T Chapman; D J Hodgson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Female mediation of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stefan Lüpold; Scott Pitnick; Kirstin S Berben; Cecilia S Blengini; John M Belote; Mollie K Manier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Autosomal variation for male body size and sperm competition phenotypes is uncorrelated in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Linda Amah; Anthony C Fiumera
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Evaluating the genetic architecture of quantitative traits via selection followed by inbreeding.

Authors:  Robert J Dugand; W Jason Kennington; Joseph L Tomkins
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females.

Authors:  Tristan A F Long; Alison Pischedda; Andrew D Stewart; William R Rice
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.