Literature DB >> 16096089

Do female Drosophila melanogaster adaptively bias offspring sex ratios in relation to the age of their mate?

Tristan A F Long1, Alison Pischedda.   

Abstract

Modification of offspring sex ratios in response to parental quality is predicted when the long-term fitness returns of sons and daughters differ. One factor that may influence a mother's sex allocation decision is the quality (or attractiveness) of her mate. We investigated whether the sex ratios of offspring produced by female Drosophila melanogaster are biased with respect to the age of the males to which they are mated, and whether there is an adaptive basis for this phenomenon. We found that females mated to old males (13 d post-eclosion) initially produced a greater proportion of daughters than did females mated to young males (1 d post-eclosion). This pattern does not appear to be due to a systematic difference in the numbers or mortality of the X- and Y-bearing sperm originating from old and young fathers, as the overall sex ratios of all offspring produced from a single copulation did not differ between broods fathered by the two types of males. The sons of older males fared worse in competitive mating assays than did the sons of younger males, while daughters of old and young males were of comparable fitness. These results suggest that there is an adaptive basis for the observed sex ratio modification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16096089      PMCID: PMC1559865          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  18 in total

1.  Criteria for demonstrating female sperm choice.

Authors:  S Pitnick; W D Brown
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Within-clutch variation in offspring sex determined by differences in sire body size: cryptic mate choice in the wild.

Authors:  Ryan Calsbeek; Barry Sinervo
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 3.  Female remating, sperm competition and sexual selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  Shree Ram Singh; Bashisth N Singh; Hugo F Hoenigsberg
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2002-09-30

4.  Sex, mutation and fitness: asymmetric costs and routes to recovery through compensatory evolution.

Authors:  A Pischedda; A Chippindale
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  A Study of the Factors Affecting Fertility of Lozenge Females of Drosophila Melanogaster.

Authors:  R C Anderson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1945-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Sex ratio adjustment in relation to paternal attractiveness in a wild bird population.

Authors:  H Ellegren; L Gustafsson; B C Sheldon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Rates of spontaneous mutation.

Authors:  J W Drake; B Charlesworth; D Charlesworth; J F Crow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Genetic dissection of sexual behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D Yamamoto; J M Jallon; A Komatsu
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 19.686

9.  Possible nonrandom utilization of X- and Y-bearing sperm in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A P Mange
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Courtship behavior in Drosophila.

Authors:  H T Spieth
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 19.686

View more
  4 in total

1.  Repeated stress exposure results in a survival-reproduction trade-off in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Katie E Marshall; Brent J Sinclair
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Association between sex ratio distortion and sexually antagonistic fitness consequences of female choice.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Erin Jakubowski
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Drosophila as a useful model for understanding the evolutionary physiology of obesity resistance and metabolic thrift.

Authors:  Lindsey J Gray; Marla B Sokolowski; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.160

4.  Frequency-dependent two-sex models: a new approach to sex ratio evolution with multiple maternal conditions.

Authors:  Esther Shyu; Hal Caswell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.