Literature DB >> 30967644

Evaluating the genetic architecture of quantitative traits via selection followed by inbreeding.

Robert J Dugand1,2, W Jason Kennington3, Joseph L Tomkins3.   

Abstract

The deleterious mutation model proposes that quantitative trait variation should be dominated by rare, partially recessive, deleterious mutations. Following artificial selection on a focal trait, the ratio of the difference in inbreeding effects between control and selected populations (ΔB), to the difference in trait means caused by directional selection (ΔM), can inform the extent to which deleterious mutations cause quantitative trait variation. Here, we apply the ΔB/ΔM ratio test to two quantitative traits (male mating success and body size) in Drosophila melanogaster. For both traits, ΔB/ΔM ratios suggested that intermediate-frequency alleles, rather than rare, partially recessive alleles (i.e. deleterious mutations), caused quantitative trait variation. We discuss these results in relation to viability data, exploring how differences between regimens in segregating (measured through inbreeding) and fixed (measured through population crosses) mutational load could affect the ratio test. Finally, we present simulations that test the statistical power of the ratio test, providing guidelines for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30967644      PMCID: PMC6781166          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-019-0219-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  36 in total

1.  Studies in quantitative inheritance. XI. Genetic and environmental correlation between body size and egg production in Drosophila melanogaster. 1957.

Authors:  Forbes W Robertson
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Life history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation.

Authors:  Susan E Johnston; Jacob Gratten; Camillo Berenos; Jill G Pilkington; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Josephine M Pemberton; Jon Slate
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Life-history consequences of egg size in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R B Azevedo; V French; L Partridge
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 4.  The genetics of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; John H Willis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the evolutionary forces maintaining genetic variation for quantitative traits?

Authors:  Emily B Josephs; John R Stinchcombe; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  The effect of inbreeding on male mating ability inDrosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W W Pendlebury; J F Kidwell
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  The deleterious effects of high inbreeding on male Drosophila melanogaster attractiveness are observed under competitive but not under non-competitive conditions.

Authors:  Terhi M Valtonen; Derek A Roff; Markus J Rantala
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Gene-environment interaction for body size and larval density in Drosophila melanogaster: an investigation of effects on development time, thorax length and adult sex ratio.

Authors:  M Santos; K Fowler; L Partridge
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 9.  Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas.

Authors:  J Merilä; B C Sheldon
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Using observation-level random effects to model overdispersion in count data in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Xavier A Harrison
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.