OBJECTIVE: To explore prospectively the hypothesis that MRI of the acutely locked knee can alter surgical decision-making. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: The study group comprised patients with a clinical diagnosis of knee locking requiring arthroscopy. The decision to carry out arthroscopy was made by an experienced consultant orthopaedic surgeon specialising in trauma and recorded in the patient's notes prior to MRI. Preoperative MRI was carried out using a 1.5 T system. The management was altered from surgical to conservative treatment in 20 (48%) patients on the basis of the MR findings. Arthroscopy was limited to patients with an MR diagnosis of a mechanical block, usually a displaced meniscal tear or loose body. Both patient groups were followed clinically until symptoms resolved. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were entered into the study. MRI identified a mechanical cause for locking in 22 patients (21 avulsion meniscal tears and 1 loose body). All were confirmed at arthroscopy. Twenty patients were changed from operative to non-operative treatment on the basis of the MRI findings. One patient in this group required a delayed arthroscopy for an impinging anterior cruciate ligament stump. The sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of MRI in identifying patients who require arthroscopy was therefore 96%/100%/98% respectively. CONCLUSION: MRI can successfully segregate patients with a clinical diagnosis of mechanical locking into those who have a true mechanical block and those who can be treated conservatively. MRI should precede arthroscopy in this clinical setting.
OBJECTIVE: To explore prospectively the hypothesis that MRI of the acutely locked knee can alter surgical decision-making. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: The study group comprised patients with a clinical diagnosis of knee locking requiring arthroscopy. The decision to carry out arthroscopy was made by an experienced consultant orthopaedic surgeon specialising in trauma and recorded in the patient's notes prior to MRI. Preoperative MRI was carried out using a 1.5 T system. The management was altered from surgical to conservative treatment in 20 (48%) patients on the basis of the MR findings. Arthroscopy was limited to patients with an MR diagnosis of a mechanical block, usually a displaced meniscal tear or loose body. Both patient groups were followed clinically until symptoms resolved. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were entered into the study. MRI identified a mechanical cause for locking in 22 patients (21 avulsion meniscal tears and 1 loose body). All were confirmed at arthroscopy. Twenty patients were changed from operative to non-operative treatment on the basis of the MRI findings. One patient in this group required a delayed arthroscopy for an impinging anterior cruciate ligament stump. The sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of MRI in identifying patients who require arthroscopy was therefore 96%/100%/98% respectively. CONCLUSION: MRI can successfully segregate patients with a clinical diagnosis of mechanical locking into those who have a true mechanical block and those who can be treated conservatively. MRI should precede arthroscopy in this clinical setting.
Authors: E Liodakis; S Hankemeier; M Jagodzinski; R Meller; C Krettek; J Brand Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2009-06-25 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Sebastien Benali; Patrick R Johnston; Ali Gholipour; Monet E Dugan; Keith Heberlein; Himanshu Bhat; Sarah D Bixby Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2018-01-13 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Michael Makdissi; Karl O Eriksson; Hayden G Morris; David A Young Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2005-11-26 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Nicholas Bien; Pranav Rajpurkar; Robyn L Ball; Jeremy Irvin; Allison Park; Erik Jones; Michael Bereket; Bhavik N Patel; Kristen W Yeom; Katie Shpanskaya; Safwan Halabi; Evan Zucker; Gary Fanton; Derek F Amanatullah; Christopher F Beaulieu; Geoffrey M Riley; Russell J Stewart; Francis G Blankenberg; David B Larson; Ricky H Jones; Curtis P Langlotz; Andrew Y Ng; Matthew P Lungren Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 11.069