Sebastien Benali1, Patrick R Johnston1, Ali Gholipour1, Monet E Dugan1, Keith Heberlein2, Himanshu Bhat2, Sarah D Bixby3. 1. Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. 2. Siemens Medical Solutions, Charlestown, MA, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. sarah.bixby@childrens.harvard.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare knee MRI performed with the integrated parallel acquisition technique (PAT) and simultaneous multislice (SMS) turbo spin echo (TSE) T2-weighted (T2w) sequences with conventional TSE sequences in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective IRB-approved study. Seventy-four subjects (26 male, 48 female, mean age 15.3 years, range 8-20) underwent 3-T MRI of the knee with a T2w TSE pulse sequence prototype with four-fold PAT and SMS acceleration as well as the standard PAT-only accelerated sequences. Images were anonymized and two study folders were created: one examination with only T2w PAT2 images (conventional examination) and one examination with only T2w SMS2/PAT2 sequences (SMS examination). Two readers rated examinations for 15 specific imaging findings and 5 quality metrics. Interreader agreement was measured. Signal to noise (SNR) and contrast to noise (CNR) were measured for SMS and conventional T2w sequences. RESULTS: Consensus review demonstrated diagnostic quality performance of SMS examinations with respect to all 15 structures. Average area under the curve (AROC) was 0.95 and 0.97 for readers 1 and 2, respectively. The conventional sequence was favored over SMS for four out of five quality metrics (p < 0.001). SNR and CNR were higher for the conventional sequences compared to SMS. CONCLUSION: SMS accelerated T2w TSE sequences offer a faster alternative for knee imaging in pediatric patients without compromise in diagnostic performance despite diminished SNR. The four-fold acceleration of SMS is beneficial to pediatric patients who often have difficulty staying still for long MRI examinations.
PURPOSE: To compare knee MRI performed with the integrated parallel acquisition technique (PAT) and simultaneous multislice (SMS) turbo spin echo (TSE) T2-weighted (T2w) sequences with conventional TSE sequences in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective IRB-approved study. Seventy-four subjects (26 male, 48 female, mean age 15.3 years, range 8-20) underwent 3-T MRI of the knee with a T2w TSE pulse sequence prototype with four-fold PAT and SMS acceleration as well as the standard PAT-only accelerated sequences. Images were anonymized and two study folders were created: one examination with only T2w PAT2 images (conventional examination) and one examination with only T2w SMS2/PAT2 sequences (SMS examination). Two readers rated examinations for 15 specific imaging findings and 5 quality metrics. Interreader agreement was measured. Signal to noise (SNR) and contrast to noise (CNR) were measured for SMS and conventional T2w sequences. RESULTS: Consensus review demonstrated diagnostic quality performance of SMS examinations with respect to all 15 structures. Average area under the curve (AROC) was 0.95 and 0.97 for readers 1 and 2, respectively. The conventional sequence was favored over SMS for four out of five quality metrics (p < 0.001). SNR and CNR were higher for the conventional sequences compared to SMS. CONCLUSION:SMS accelerated T2w TSE sequences offer a faster alternative for knee imaging in pediatric patients without compromise in diagnostic performance despite diminished SNR. The four-fold acceleration of SMS is beneficial to pediatric patients who often have difficulty staying still for long MRI examinations.
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Pierrick Coupé; José V Manjón; Elias Gedamu; Douglas Arnold; Montserrat Robles; D Louis Collins Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2010-03-20 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Felix A Breuer; Martin Blaimer; Robin M Heidemann; Matthias F Mueller; Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: E J Maurer; P A Kaplan; R G Dussault; D R Diduch; A Schuett; F C McCue; P P Hornsby; B J Hillman Journal: Radiology Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Steen Moeller; Essa Yacoub; Cheryl A Olman; Edward Auerbach; John Strupp; Noam Harel; Kâmil Uğurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jan Fritz; Benjamin Fritz; Jialu Zhang; Gaurav K Thawait; Dharmdev H Joshi; Li Pan; Dingxin Wang Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Judith Herrmann; Gabriel Keller; Sebastian Gassenmaier; Dominik Nickel; Gregor Koerzdoerfer; Mahmoud Mostapha; Haidara Almansour; Saif Afat; Ahmed E Othman Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 7.034