Literature DB >> 27900295

Diagnostic performance of volume and limited oblique MRI of the anterior cruciate ligament compared to knee arthroscopy.

Paula J Richards1, Iain McCall1, Alexandra Kraus1, Mary Jones2, Gayle Maffulli3, Stephen Bridgman3, Nicola Maffulli4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many strategies have been used to improve the visualisation of the ACL including sagittal, coronal oblique sequences, and 3D volume imaging. Nevertheless, the ACL may not always be visualised.
METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-one consecutive patients (77 females; 154 males; average age 43.5, range 18 to 82 years; 205 with chronic, 20 acute, and 6 acute on chronic symptoms) underwent knee arthroscopy for mechanical symptoms within a week of MRI. After routine orthogonal sequences, if general MRI radiographers, with over four years experience, were not able to identify the presence of the ACL, then two 3D volume sequences and 2D limited sagittal oblique T1 sequences were performed. Patients requiring extra sequences, missed by the radiography technicians, were recalled. The MRI sequences were evaluated in a blinded fashion by three radiologists, and compared to the knee arthroscopy findings, with the normal ACL acting as internal controls. The radiography technicians performed additional ACL sequences in 63 patients (27%); of these, 10 patients had a partial and 12 patients had a complete ACL tear. Only 2 patients (0.6%) were recalled (one with a normal, and one with a full thickness ACL tear).
RESULTS: The filmed ACL evaluation for complete tears and a normal ACL had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 97.1% and accuracy of 97.3%, slightly higher than evaluating on the monitor. Volume sequences had specificities and accuracies over 95%, with good intraobserver reliability (Kappa 0.859, 95% CI 0.705-1.0). Experienced radiographers identified most cases requiring supplementary MRI ACL sequences. An additional volume sequence was beneficial when filmed. Use of the monitor can offer some benefits. Limited oblique T1 sequence of the intercondylar notch was unreliable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL MRI; MRI; anterior cruciate ligament; knee arthroscopy; volume sequences

Year:  2016        PMID: 27900295      PMCID: PMC5115253          DOI: 10.11138/mltj/2016.6.2.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J        ISSN: 2240-4554


  32 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of anterior cruciate ligament tears: evaluation of standard orthogonal and tailored paracoronal images.

Authors:  S R Duc; M Zanetti; J Kramer; K P Käch; C L Zollikofer; K U Wentz
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.990

2.  Oblique MR imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament based on three-dimensional orientation.

Authors:  Martin J Breitenseher; Marius E Mayerhoefer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal - Basic principles and recommendations in clinical and field Science Research: 2016 Update.

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Francesco Oliva; Antonio Frizziero; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-05-19

4.  MR imaging of the knee in the sagittal projection: comparison of three-dimensional gradient-echo and spin-echo sequences.

Authors:  J D Reeder; S O Matz; L Becker; S M Andelman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: diagnostic performance studies.

Authors:  R Mackenzie; C R Palmer; D J Lomas; A K Dixon
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  MR evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament: value of supplementing sagittal images with coronal and axial images.

Authors:  S W Fitzgerald; E M Remer; H Friedman; L F Rogers; R W Hendrix; M F Schafer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Accuracy of nonorthogonal magnetic resonance imaging in acute disruption of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  A D Vellet; P Marks; P Fowler; T Munro
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Partial ACL rupture: an MR diagnosis?

Authors:  L Yao; A Gentili; L Petrus; J K Lee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Comparison of conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging with fat suppression [correction for suppresion] in cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Igor Borić; Marko Pecina; Ivan Bojanić; Miroslav Haspl; Goran Roić
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.351

10.  MR imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament: frequency of discordant findings on sagittal-oblique images and correlation with arthroscopic findings.

Authors:  D K Smith; D A May; P Phillips
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  1 in total

1.  Treatment of Combined Injuries to the ACL and the MCL Complex: A Consensus Statement of the Ligament Injury Committee of the German Knee Society (DKG).

Authors:  Daniel Guenther; Thomas Pfeiffer; Wolf Petersen; Andreas Imhoff; Mirco Herbort; Andrea Achtnich; Thomas Stein; Christoph Kittl; Christian Schoepp; Ralph Akoto; Jürgen Höher; Sven Scheffler; Amelie Stöhr; Thomas Stoffels; Julian Mehl; Tobias Jung; Andree Ellermann; Christian Eberle; Cara Vernacchia; Patricia Lutz; Matthias Krause; Natalie Mengis; Peter E Müller; Thomas Patt; Raymond Best
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-11-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.